the real reason most websites dont give CF a 10/10

[Megamannt125]

bcuz they timetravel to get everything and it ruins theyre experience .
can someone plz lock this >.>

 

[SeiferA]

Actually, it's because most gamers around here can't enjoy a game unless it has a lot of action, shooting, etc etc etc. In Animal Crossing's case, they want the game to be a completely different game altogether. It's the same reason why they complain about Pokemon after a while ("We want a 3d Pokemon game in the main game line!")

Nintendo's philosophy has always been "If it isn't broken, don't fix it". They do that with both Animal Crossing and Pokemon, and though people across the seas complain about it, their home base in Japan never complain and love the games just the same.

Besides, imagine a Nintendo where they redid their games like how Sega redoes Sonic every 2-3 years these days

 

[Megamannt125]

Actually, it's because most gamers around here can't enjoy a game unless it has a lot of action, shooting, etc etc etc. In Animal Crossing's case, they want the game to be a completely different game altogether. It's the same reason why they complain about Pokemon after a while ("We want a 3d Pokemon game in the main game line!")

Nintendo's philosophy has always been "If it isn't broken, don't fix it". They do that with both Animal Crossing and Pokemon, and though people across the seas complain about it, their home base in Japan never complain and love the games just the same.

Besides, imagine a Nintendo where they redid their games like how Sega redoes Sonic every 2-3 years these days

i hate ppl who think that every game has to be different i hope every AC game after city folk is exactly like it most of the time big changes in a game mess up the series (Example: Sonic) bettr safe than sorry

 

[solsticeviolet]

In Animal Crossing's case, they want the game to be a completely different game altogether.

That has got to be one of the most accurate things I've heard about gamers and Animal Crossing in a long time! I think people feel that way about a lot of what Nintendo creates. Everyone wants everything they do to be like the 360. If you have a Wii... you're not going to get that. And if you expect it, you're barking up the wrong tree.

 

[Animal Dublin]

I have said this from the start people are getting frustrated because they want everything to happen from the start. How many people have just stopped running around and looked at the sky and surroundings and think "This is nice I could get real compfortable here. I should take my time and let it all come to me" This game has showed gamers nothing yet it is lest then a week old and I truely believe it could be a bit of a pandoras box. Watch how your neighbours and visitors grow have a party day for yourself and some other users and enjoy it

 

[KingKombat]

I agree. People need to just slow down and watch the beauty of Animal Crossing. It isn't a damned race, it's a slow paced game! You cant just have stuff fall into your lap like in an action game or Role Playing game!

 

[Furry Sparks]

Or because... you know... they actually played it and thought it didn't deserve a 10? Just a though.

 

[Lman013]

^^ NOOOOOOooooOoOoOoOoOoO!!!! that NEVER happens in game rating history!!! ^^^^^



*sarcasm*

 

[SpikeHawk]

They did time travel, look at IGN's Halloween, and in a lot of their videos they have messy hair!

 

[Furry Sparks]

What, would you rather wait a year for them to get a review out?

 

[Megamannt125]

What, would you rather wait a year for them to get a review out?

yes

 

[Furry Sparks]

What, would you rather wait a year for them to get a review out?

yes

That's a great idea, that will really help out the people looking for a review to see if they should get the game or not. It will also get the site a ton of views.

 

[Zephent]

What, would you rather wait a year for them to get a review out?

yes

Wow, your logic is flawed in so many ways, my friend.

 

[Megamannt125]

What, would you rather wait a year for them to get a review out?

yes

Wow, your logic is flawed in so many ways, my friend.

:brrrr: that made me sad

 

[Furry Sparks]

What, would you rather wait a year for them to get a review out?

yes

Wow, your logic is flawed in so many ways, my friend.

:brrrr: that made me sad

It's the truth.

 

[Lman013]

What, would you rather wait a year for them to get a review out?

yes

Wow, your logic is flawed in so many ways, my friend.

:brrrr: that made me sad

If I say sawry..Will you still get rich if I give you all my bells?

 

[Megamannt125]

What, would you rather wait a year for them to get a review out?

yes

Wow, your logic is flawed in so many ways, my friend.

:brrrr: that made me sad

If I say sawry..Will you still get rich if I give you all my bells?

maybe :llama:

 

[SeiferA]

Or because... you know... they actually played it and thought it didn't deserve a 10? Just a though.

Ain't saying it deserves a 10. If you look at the review sites, most of them are giving the game 6-7s out of 10s because it's the "same old game".

It's not really the score that bugs me but more so the comments.

 

[solsticeviolet]

Or because... you know... they actually played it and thought it didn't deserve a 10? Just a though.

No one said that wasn't a possibility. But the reason many reviewers believe this is because they want it to be more "exciting". Animal Crossing isn't really supposed to "exciting". If you want exciting, play Mario Galaxy or Brawl.

 

[TheFarmboy]

All the reviewers care about is these;
1. Graphics
2. M rated games (such as GTA, instant 10/10)
3. They rushes, instead of savouring.
4. Sadest one, hates Nintendo