Ukraine scandal

No citizen should be charged for a crime with inconclusive evidence.

Not sure how that confused you. Maybe if you read the rest of the sentence after the comma, you’d get the point. You even ignored my suggestion and referenced, what I’m guessing you assume is disingenuous, rather than point me to a non-opinion piece stating how well Ford’s witnesses strengthened her allegations.

Lol.
 
you're right. now go say the same to all the people charged with *far* less evidence then what is already had on trump (not that trump could even of been charged to begin with, since olc opinion)

and idk wtf you're rambling about in the second part, though I'm not the one posting an article literally labelled as an opinion piece as proof of citation lack of credibility

though also, where did I say they were credible either? I said investigators were blocked from pursuing corroborating testimony, and as such, because they were unable to do a proper and full investigation, it was a sham.
 
Last edited:
you're right. now go say the same to all the people charged with *far* less evidence then what is already had on trump (not that trump could even of been charged to begin with, since olc opinion)

and idk wtf you're rambling about in the second part, though I'm not the one posting an article literally labelled as an opinion piece as proof of citation lack of credibility

though also, where did I say they were credible either? I said investigators were blocked from pursuing corroborating testimony, and as such, because they were unable to do a proper and full investigation, it was a sham.

Told you

Dude could kill someone, and get away with it so long as its with a cool gun. In fact, while indirectly, there have been 8 children to have died from the strict inhumane nature at the border.
 
the application of the border camps already count as genocide per the definition laid out by the united nations post-wwii

really makes one wonder why trump withdrew america from the un human rights council last year, huh?
 
Last edited:
you're right. now go say the same to all the people charged with *far* less evidence then what is already had on trump (not that trump could even of been charged to begin with, since olc opinion)

and idk wtf you're rambling about in the second part, though I'm not the one posting an article literally labelled as an opinion piece as proof of citation lack of credibility


though also, where did I say they were credible either? I said investigators were blocked from pursuing corroborating testimony, and as such, because they were unable to do a proper and full investigation, it was a sham.

I said “no citizen”, that includes all citizens.

That article goes over the witnesses account. The point is they did not align with Ford’s story. I never claimed it wasn’t an opinion piece, I said it’s not an opinion that her witnesses didn’t help her testimony. Then went on to tell you that you’d reach the same conclusion doing your own research; which you ignored, and cut off half of my sentence when quoting me. I referenced it because it easily summarizes the inaccuracies, but you’re free to dig through actual quotes from the investigation/hearing if you choose.

Do you get it now? But my bad for messing up the sentence in my last post, though. “Referenced what I’m guessing you assume is a disingenuous opinion piece”*

And I already stated they should’ve taken everything into account, so yeah.
 
Back
Top