What type of movies do you think are worse?

[-Apples-]

GIVE THE EMOJI MOVIE A CHANCE

I don't know about that. Yes, every movie due to being released in theaters should be released, but I don't think it will do well in the box office. It may be a flop where the deficit exceeds the gross (or when the production budget is more than twice as much as the total worldwide gross). It can also score very badly on Rotten Tomatoes, IMBD, Cinemascore, and Metacritic. The problem here is that emojis aren't worth making movies out of. Some may say the same for Legos, but at least Lego had some good movies in my opinion. Emojis on the other hand, doesn't look like something worth it.

 

[forestyne]

GIVE THE EMOJI MOVIE A CHANCE

it shouldn't have been given a chance to begin with

 

[Nuclear Bingo]

Usually when I see a movie that's **** or a trailer that's ****, I'm not surprised to find it's based on a book.

 

[Alienfish]

it shouldn't have been given a chance to begin with

Yeah, those franchise/random popular trendy stuff are usually just a moneygrabber and something they just need people to go and see for nothing :|

Also a lot of dubbed anime, in particular movies. Mostly because all US dubs has the same action-y, whiny, semi-girl voice for all female characters and this tough macho guy voice for all the males pretty much. This goes for a lot of series as well but yeah bad dubs are a sure pseudo-genre that can go suck it for my part.

 

[MishMeesh]

When I saw the trailer for the Emoji Movie my eyes rolled so far back into my head I could see my brain.

I would ask what you mean by "rip-offs", though. Are they separate from unnecessary sequels? I sometimes refer to unnecessary sequels as rip-offs. It seems like it just encompasses the bad ones of all the other options listed.

 

[-Apples-]

When I saw the trailer for the Emoji Movie my eyes rolled so far back into my head I could see my brain.

I would ask what you mean by "rip-offs", though. Are they separate from unnecessary sequels? I sometimes refer to unnecessary sequels as rip-offs. It seems like it just encompasses the bad ones of all the other options listed.

I thought rip-offs had a simple definition. When I mean rip-offs, I don't mean unnecessary sequels. I mean movies made by different people than the producers of the original, but actually stole the idea without their approval.

 

[Mink777]

I am not a fan of most reboots at all cough cough Ghostbusters cough cough.

 

[Delphine]

"Other": I generally don't enjoy very slow and intellectual movies (with some exceptions to the rule). They're usually the worst to me.
For the rest I've nothing against any specific type of movies... I don't really like war films, that's the only genre I'm not a fan of.

 

[MishMeesh]

I thought rip-offs had a simple definition. When I mean rip-offs, I don't mean unnecessary sequels. I mean movies made by different people than the producers of the original, but actually stole the idea without their approval.

Ah okay, I see what you mean. I guess I just don't see that happening much in that way, they tend to either class themselves as remakes or reboots or "inspired by" or something.

 

[nintendofan85]

I am not a fan of most reboots at all cough cough Ghostbusters cough cough.

Wow, I'm surprised you say that. I actually thought that movie was good.

 

[gravitycrossing]

as soon as you mentioned the emoji movie i cringed so hard

 

[tybalt_cake]

Uncreative movies , like the emoji movie. Like , even a 10 year old can do the plot of a movie for that.
Rip-offs , any kind of ripoff in any way is wrong.

 

[Alienfish]

"Other": I generally don't enjoy very slow and intellectual movies (with some exceptions to the rule). They're usually the worst to me.
For the rest I've nothing against any specific type of movies... I don't really like war films, that's the only genre I'm not a fan of.

Haha, I actually love those slow old things... I don't know if you've seen Gertrud by Carl Th. Dreyer but yeah that kinds are awesome. I'd prefer that to fast-paced empty action.

And yeah, there are some great war movies I'd guess but it's nothing I jump over unless I know it's more of a side-story during a war or stuff.

 

[Rasha]

Rip offs and some cash grabs like that horrible movie From Justin to Kelly. also, for the love of god, if you're making a low budget movie stay away from using cheap computer effects because it makes the best of movies somewhat laughable

 

[Alienfish]

And yeah if one means those recent year "intellectual" movies then yes I agree they are a+ trash things.

also yeah romantic comedies can go die in a bin.

 

[-Apples-]

I would also scorn movies directed by some directors or star some annoying celebrities.

Spoiler: Guess who the real main antagonist of the Transformers series is

It's Michael Bay, the director that never makes good movies.

 

[Alienfish]

"deep relation dramas" where they just end up screaming and each other, go separate ways and then talk at the end like. um.

also white-washed historical movies.. just.. no.

 

[boujee]

Do you mean the nonsensical films like God's Not Dead or Christian films as a whole?

God is not dead is religious propaganda, so it doesn't count as a movie. There's some good Christian movies but they're mostly pandering.

 

[Ghost Soda]

Personally, the kind of movies that I've really been growing to hate is those pseudo edgy remakes where they take something that's supposed to be lighthearted and fun and shove in unnecessary violence, drama, death, angst and whatnot and tie the whole thing up by making everything more grey and bland looking.

Like, chill guys, not everything's gotta be dark and depressing or have some deep meaning or w/e. Just let fun movies be fun! :U

 

[Romaki]

Definitely uncreative movies who have been simply created for guaranteed commercial success.