Do you think Nintendo Was Lazy when they made this

krazystitch said:
KingKombat said:
Ya, seriously. How dare you people who may have no experience making games know what they have been through? I'd love to see you guys do better. Unless you know how to make a game like this, you have no right saying they were lazy.
You tell em, King!
I obviosly not hard to make great games, look at the zelda and mario series. you just have to put a lot of time and effort into them.
 
Palad said:
[n,Dec 27 2008, 12:12:33 AM]Yeah, since animal crossing dies if you dont play it for a while, it should be one of those games that keeps the old AC, and adds double. For instance, in this, you should be able to design a town after you get like 10mil bells. But there should be massive upgrades in each one, yet they should keep old things

AC is a game that takes time to progress- its a game that takes a lifetime to complete, not one of those 1-month games. If you dont play it for a while, you better make a new ACC or something, because your town will be pretty messed up.

Going back to a AC game just to get the feel of it is ok, but to 'Beat' it is out of the question. So they should work really hard on AC games so that you have no urdge to go back to old AC games
Yeah I see what you mean, but I don't want to buy a million copies of a game, just to in the end get one big version of the game, kinda like expansion packs.
 
Palad said:
[n,Dec 27 2008, 12:12:33 AM]Yeah, since animal crossing dies if you dont play it for a while, it should be one of those games that keeps the old AC, and adds double. For instance, in this, you should be able to design a town after you get like 10mil bells. But there should be massive upgrades in each one, yet they should keep old things

AC is a game that takes time to progress- its a game that takes a lifetime to complete, not one of those 1-month games. If you dont play it for a while, you better make a new ACC or something, because your town will be pretty messed up.

Going back to a AC game just to get the feel of it is ok, but to 'Beat' it is out of the question. So they should work really hard on AC games so that you have no urdge to go back to old AC games
What im saying is, once your town is messed up, you prety much gotta start over. And in AC, starting over isnt too fun... catching fishyou already caught... rebonding with animals... Re-getting all the bells... its torture
 
KingKombat said:
Ya, seriously. How dare you people who may have no experience making games know what they have been through? I'd love to see you guys do better. Unless you know how to make a game like this, you have no right saying they were lazy.
Of course I would not be able to make a better game...lol....but nintendo could because that is what they are supposed to do.
 
Kpspen said:
Palad said:
[n,Dec 27 2008, 12:12:33 AM]Yeah, since animal crossing dies if you dont play it for a while, it should be one of those games that keeps the old AC, and adds double. For instance, in this, you should be able to design a town after you get like 10mil bells. But there should be massive upgrades in each one, yet they should keep old things

AC is a game that takes time to progress- its a game that takes a lifetime to complete, not one of those 1-month games. If you dont play it for a while, you better make a new ACC or something, because your town will be pretty messed up.

Going back to a AC game just to get the feel of it is ok, but to 'Beat' it is out of the question. So they should work really hard on AC games so that you have no urdge to go back to old AC games
Yeah I see what you mean, but I don't want to buy a million copies of a game, just to in the end get one big version of the game, kinda like expansion packs.
well, i dont expect them to make expansions (like 1million). Instead of just adding a few things to ACCF, they could have added alot, and it would be like an entirely new game. More ways to comunicate, more stuff to do- Mabie even a school, or a workplace. Im not saying ACCF is bad... im just saying i like the style of AC GC alot more
 
Palad said:
[n,Dec 27 2008, 12:15:05 AM]
Palad said:
[n,Dec 27 2008, 12:12:33 AM]Yeah, since animal crossing dies if you dont play it for a while, it should be one of those games that keeps the old AC, and adds double. For instance, in this, you should be able to design a town after you get like 10mil bells. But there should be massive upgrades in each one, yet they should keep old things

AC is a game that takes time to progress- its a game that takes a lifetime to complete, not one of those 1-month games. If you dont play it for a while, you better make a new ACC or something, because your town will be pretty messed up.

Going back to a AC game just to get the feel of it is ok, but to 'Beat' it is out of the question. So they should work really hard on AC games so that you have no urdge to go back to old AC games
What im saying is, once your town is messed up, you prety much gotta start over. And in AC, starting over isnt too fun... catching fishyou already caught... rebonding with animals... Re-getting all the bells... its torture
yeah and you have to go back and get everything you got in the previous time you had it. So if you had a town for a year and restarted, you'd have to play a year JUST to get back to where you were. (And get a nice townhall model)
 
tspenc11 said:
KingKombat said:
Ya, seriously. How dare you people who may have no experience making games know what they have been through? I'd love to see you guys do better. Unless you know how to make a game like this, you have no right saying they were lazy.
Of course I would not be able to make a better game...lol....but nintendo could because that is what they are supposed to do.
What HAVE they been through? Aww poor little Nintendo has been going through tough times. They get paid all that money...............What things have they gone through to make a game? Yeah they make a game but thats their JOB......


I feel so sorry for Nintendo, making all that money and selling all those newer games that only the newer generation likes..... yeah right.
 
I'll say yeah, while there are changes the changes made are so far and few between I wouldn't even call this a sequel (if these games could be even have sequels) not even a halfquel (you know like 1.5) I'd called it Animal Crossing 2.3 if anything.

Not hating the game, just saying Nintendo needs to up its game for the next literation or else they may have lost a fan.
 
bananaoracle said:
I'll say yeah, while there are changes the changes made are so far and few between I wouldn't even call this a sequel (if these games could be even have sequels) not even a halfquel (you know like 1.5) I'd called it Animal Crossing 2.3 if anything.

Not hating the game, just saying Nintendo needs to up its game for the next literation or else they may have lost a fan.
Yeah thats what we're trying to say
 
Kpspen said:
tspenc11 said:
KingKombat said:
Ya, seriously. How dare you people who may have no experience making games know what they have been through? I'd love to see you guys do better. Unless you know how to make a game like this, you have no right saying they were lazy.
Of course I would not be able to make a better game...lol....but nintendo could because that is what they are supposed to do.
What HAVE they been through? Aww poor little Nintendo has been going through tough times. They get paid all that money...............What things have they gone through to make a game? Yeah they make a game but thats their JOB......


I feel so sorry for Nintendo, making all that money and selling all those newer games that only the newer generation likes..... yeah right.
By the way, i might sound like a nerd, but currently im researching how to make games on flash. I gotta do it for this big school project =P. Im gonna make a profecional game at the end like on www.miniclip.com Of cource, something like AC takes 100s of people, that would be like 30 years older than me. So king kombat, you cant say that... because its THEIR JOB. For all i care, they can get fired, and a new, better crew can take their place... They get outragous loads of money for being... well... lazy
 
Palad said:
[n,Dec 27 2008, 12:26:11 AM]Thinking about it, AC is all the same theme music... just different tones.
Yeah, pretty much, but i like it better than ACWW or ACCF music.
 
tspenc11 said:
Palad said:
[n,Dec 27 2008, 12:26:11 AM]Thinking about it, AC is all the same theme music... just different tones.
Yeah, pretty much, but i like the GC music better than ACWW or ACCF music.
same... it had the charm that the game originally was supposed to have
 
Back
Top