Well then I concede I worded it incorrectly, I'm only human and I don't always make the most eloquent points. The fact that he's running with me saying "giving him a free pass" as an attempt to turn things on me, as well as state that I think he is "100 mafia" (never said that, haven't even made the post yet) just oozes opportunistic to me. All I ever said was that if he's scum, Toads is probably town; that's not a leap in logic anyway.
People that don't want to lynch him. Frankly I don't see why it matters, I have many thoughts to share and they're coming soon.
These two posts in order (I ordered them wrong sorry) Do contradict eachother.
If you make the claim that "Anyone who doesn't want to lynch me is []" You're indirectly making the claim that you're confident I'm mafia, and can prove why.
The fact that you didn't do that while making that claim, and instead chose to backtrack on your wording like what, 5 minutes after you said it?
Screams mafia.
What I would expect Town!Ness to act would be.
"Claims that I'm mafia."
"Makes post as to all the reasons I am mafia"
"Let me interact with the post as to why I am mafia"
"Following post starts to question why the people who don't want to lynch me don't, given the points that have he has made"
Instead it looked something like.
"Claim that I'm mafia."
"Ask me two questions."
"Decide they weren't good enough."
"Claims that anyone who doesn't scumread me is []"
"Says that he misworded it and will write a post about it later."
I will admit, calling his actions like that makes it seem scummier than it is, and I might be using a fallacy I don't know the name of while making this argument, but I think this has the core of my argument.
"I really don't think Ness is acting like town the way they do things."
Really hate how they backtracked on their claim after doubling down on it.
I really hate it.