And yeah I realize I was just repeating what Dad said but that was what I thought while reading the thread too, I didn't want to just not say my one opinion just because someone said it before me
If you have ever read any of my scum chats you'll find that I'm typically annoyed of being accused of bluesniping even as scum, and a lot of the time I find it personally infuriating because there's often stuff like "three of the four dead blues claimed, how the **** are they coming to this conclusion", or "if I was bluesniping, a blue WOULD'VE died", or in the most recent case where I didn't actually bluesnipe in Hunger Games and we killed doc because we had trapper. But those two examples, bluesniping and my play in thread, are completely incomparable because at least now I'm being accused based on my gameplay, rather than something clearly not related to how I've actedAlso I never accused you of bluesniping? I was talking about how you have reacted to accusations in the past vs how you reacted to accusations now. The example of "the past" (past games) happened to be about bluesniping. The example of "now" is not about bluesniping. Obviously I know there is no bluesniping in this game.
Dang kracko that's useless
Well I'm still town, I don't want to vote for Dad though so I might be in trouble. My top two susses are you and Rune.
Dolby said:This is quite blatently scum trying to avoid their death, and Vanessa pretty much outlines here strategy here: try to pocket Dad and hope to hell that he agrees with her so that she has two votes on either me or Rune, Dad's choice. Vanessa doesn't want to vote Dad because she thinks that he's her best option to survive, however leaves the option open for survival voting. She then proceeds to sus the only two people that Dad's viewed in a negative light. No elaboration at this point, but frankly I've worn that point out. Her plan is to direct Dad to a mislynch on one of the two people that he already susses, which honestly, I don't think would work anyway. Moreover, if all two of her posts she's been leaning on Dad's opinions, clearly a bad pocketing attempt
Heck, her Antonio priest play can honestly be seen as a scum plan to. She doesn't get lynched today, and is already laying down the groundwork to say that Antonio is framing her.
This is my order of sus from most sus to least sus
Dolby - I'm conflicted about Rune so PoE + tone thing I mentioned before puts Dolby at the top.
Rune - honestly I'm wondering if he was speculating on a 4v2 setup to make it look like he's not scum and doesn't know its 5v1. 4v2 would be reeeally unbalanced. (If he's town and its 4v2 we all owe him.) However he also likes to consider multiple possibilities as town, as seen in CTSTP when he stood up for Punchy. However however, he also sticks with ideas that don't make the most sense as scum (such as in American Politics where he kept pursuing Dolby/Punchy scum team even though they were almost clear as town). I also didn't really like his last big post about Antonio where he said completely contradictory things
Dad - seems a bit different from Korean war and his tone reminds me of CTSTP
Antonio - in Korean war he just bandwagoned on the Kate lynch D1. This game he started sussing Dad all by himself, and although the way he explained it is a bit confusing and contradictory, it's a clear difference from last game and just seems like town Antonio tome.
Punchy - I thought he was town since his first post
Dolbye
ok who used the second card other than antonio own up
wait did dad own up to it and i just missed it