Hey can you acknowledge the post where I said that if det gets cc'd you'll vote sheep since it's a mechanically optimal. So that way if you don't do that, you will be smited by f3 or something. Thanks.hi mafia
Hey can you acknowledge the post where I said that if det gets cc'd you'll vote sheep since it's a mechanically optimal. So that way if you don't do that, you will be smited by f3 or something. Thanks.hi mafia
Hey can you acknowledge the post where I said that if det gets cc'd you'll vote sheep since it's a mechanically optimal. So that way if you don't do that, you will be smited by f3 or something. Thanks.
Betsy. While I appreciate it, might I recommend not leaving all of your reads against the person you believe is mafia. Like, what's the gain here. If I'm mafia I'm MORE than capable of leaving fake reads just to mess with you, is the simpler solution not just to... ignore my posts?
if theres a counterclaim i'm not voting sheep out before i vote shawo. what evidence would there be to incline that the counterclaim is more correct or true than sheeps? none.
if theres a counterclaim i'm not voting sheep out before i vote shawo. what evidence would there be to incline that the counterclaim is more correct or true than sheeps? none.
i completely agree. and shawo said they were vanilla so it would be frankly stupid on mafias side for outing the other maf with a cc.yeah claiming second is already a hail mary in most cases.
unless there's huge supporting arguments behind it all. because he's right that maf can and will claim cop to bait out the real cop to snipe next night phase, but since this game set up is open and smaller, i don't see the risk / reward worth it for mafia to do? like, it seems like a super bold play to make in a set up like this w/ only 9 players.
i completely agree. and shawo said they were vanilla so it would be frankly stupid on mafias side for outing the other maf with a cc.
When i said that I meant through det, guess I didn’t make that clearI did read you though lol??
Thanks?Random I actually think is basically 100% town. Their reads are so... so garbage. In a really towny way. I don't want to start a fight, usually, but basically what I'm trying to say is that Random's reads are SO bad, I don't think mafia could have conceivably created them.
I’m not following; why wouldn’t you be mafia? And then we’d just need to figure out who your partner isOk two things (sorry an emergency propped up.)
One: I'm not saying that you have to believing the situation, I'm saying that's the situation fmpov. I know I'm town, so therefore X must be true.
Two: Actively voting me with a det cc is like actively playing against the town wincon. Like, I legitimately believe Tessa is playing dumb as mafia here, because a det cc means that voting sheep is a garunteed best option scenario.
Here's the game.
Active Det CC, so either Shawo/Det is mafia, or sheep is mafia with any partner.
If you vote Shawo and Shawo is town. Sheep is mafia confirmed, and you lose an ML.
If you vote shawo and shawo is mafia. The game is a win on the spot.
If you vote Sheep and Sheep is town. The game is a win on the spot.
If you vote sheep, and sheep is mafia. Sheep is mafia confirmed, and you keep your ML.
Like this is very basic problem solving - and all I want is an acknowledgement so no one can make the silly "haha I didn't believe that det would claim here. So i voted shawo" argument. It doesn't matter. It's a mechanical auto confirm.
I hope everything’s alrightMorning (again)! Unfortunately I'm still trying to survive IRL problems so I will be spotty.
I do see the snake was out and about so that's fun.
Active Det CC, so either Shawo/Det is mafia, or sheep is mafia with any partner.
If you vote Shawo and Shawo is town. Sheep is mafia confirmed, and you lose an ML.
If you vote shawo and shawo is mafia. The game is a win on the spot.
If you vote Sheep and Sheep is town. The game is a win on the spot.
If you vote sheep, and sheep is mafia. Sheep is mafia confirmed, and you keep your ML.
But to clarify things, I've outlined my interpretation of shawo's gameplay on d1 and d2 as I see it now. I've tried to avoid being long winded and kept it brief, highlighting just the major points. Also tried not to offend anyone. Again, it's just my take on possible motivations and outcomes of shawo's gameplay d1 and d2.
this was me being a bit scrambled. I don’t quite understand what you’re saying here. I was theorizing on what it meant that betsy and tae were quick to flip to follow shawo in voting.
I’m really sorry but I’m genuinely confused as to what you mean by the last paragraph;; Like I don’t understand what’s being said
I don't see what you mean, she seems like she's mostly on the same train of thought as all of us.@Totally_RandomYT What do you think about Tessa right now.
if theres a counterclaim i'm not voting sheep out before i vote shawo. what evidence would there be to incline that the counterclaim is more correct or true than sheeps? none.
and there wont be a counterclaim anyway. if there was one this late after sheeps claim that would be outrageously suspicious like why wouldn't cc det just claim immediately unless trying to protect shawo?
Yeah okay I've now read what went on during me sleeping. Desperate Shawo is desperate, that's about everything I have to add. Not much to fistfight in his response since he's chosen this path. I cannot read Shawo well enough to know what to make of his "reads" changing.
@Totally_RandomYT What do you think about Tessa right now.
Post automatically merged:
Since I don't like leaving people confused and I wrote that at like... Too Late AM, my point in the last paragraph was that if you were mafia with Shawo then why would you -when given the chance to shift blame- decide to say Betsy and Tae were pinged by Shawo to vote. That's you basically saying 'My maf partner forced them to vote so I don't think Betsy+Tae are necessarily evil." Does that make more sense?
Post automatically merged:
The decision to point out that bit of info leans as town to me? Like I guess it could be distancing but it feels like a very weird attempt at that if the case.
Since I don't like leaving people confused and I wrote that at like... Too Late AM, my point in the last paragraph was that if you were mafia with Shawo then why would you -when given the chance to shift blame- decide to say Betsy and Tae were pinged by Shawo to vote. That's you basically saying 'My maf partner forced them to vote so I don't think Betsy+Tae are necessarily evil." Does that make more sense?
Post automatically merged:
The decision to point out that bit of info leans as town to me? Like I guess it could be distancing but it feels like a very weird attempt at that if the case.