Okay so I'm conscious now and I wanted to comment on some things. I found it really interesting to see how many players suddenly vehemently jumped on the anti-policy lynch without providing any thought at all to contribute right after
Sataric. That looks super duper pro town so you're obviously green! /sarcasm.
Well you were screeching about no-policy, so I expected you to bring something else up since you're Sataric. Explaining reasoning for a policy lynch isn't passive and I'm getting sick to death of you guys using that ****ing word.
Trundle used it like a parrot last game passive
passive passive. Lets talk about actually passive playstyles like
Ness flip flopping around like a fish with his suspicions and then ultimately voting for Trojan anyways? I find it interesting how you seem to clear a new player (that is friends with you) when you don't usually seem to ever do that in a game this early. I'm a bit annoyed at how much of a hypocrite you are
Sataric, considering you used to join in on the Day One Cory lynches all the time. Please hop down off of your high horse and don't villainise players that are suggesting a spammer lynch with the word "bullying". Note how
Trojan isn't actually spamming gifs? That's because he knows that he could actually be lynched for it instead of people just complaining about it.
I don't know where you got me flip floping my suspicions from, but i'm going to assume that this is a situation between my suspicions of Tom and Trojan. Let me put it blunt: Tom's recent posts are puting him in my null reads, as i've been suspicious of him since this point but after posts 186 and post 200 have made me reconsider these opinions. I also had received this PM from him when I was explaining my theory to him~
"I figured that out as I passed out last night, I'm just wondering how it was relevant in the grand scheme of things. Ultimately one or both of us could still be lying, using it as a ploy to get invited to PM circles and pump them dry for information. I sure hope that if you're doing your QT things you're thoroughly keep an eye on everyone there."
So in other words, Tom is back in my null reads. On the other hand, I have Trojan onto my scum reads since he's striking me a bit as odd now. My reasoning for this is explained below.
Also as a side note, what really spooked me about Tom was he mentioned in post 147 that he somehow knew I had a QT with the 2 people i've been trusting this game, SarasaKat and Sataric. Here is a link to the QT between me and them, Click. My main qualms came from the fact that I know Sataric's role as he is confirmed town in my eyes since anyone who visits him dies on contact. I was worried that SarasaKat was scum and had given the QT link to Tom through the scum chat, so it in general really frightened me. But with Kat's and Tom's exchanges i've begun to rethink this.
Bashing
Trojan? Since when is stating the TRUE FACTS that this player has been a proven spammer and hindrance to the town by lying or generally sht posting bashing? I didn't hear any of the veteran players in this game crying when we pointed out the same thing about
Cory back in 2014. There's no bashing here and I literally can't believe you guys brought out the word "bullying" in a mafia game considering that stating facts about a player's playstyle =/= bullying. It would be bullying if I told him he should die or something, which I didn't. Sorry about the whole 2016 we're special snowflakes and words hurt mentality, but this is mafia. If you want your safe spaces, go to tumblr.
I'm going to stop you right here, but this is a bit rude in general. I didn't see it as bullying, but if I were put on a wagon for this reasoning and having people be like "lol you suck so gtfo of here" kinda hurts a little bit, even if its mafia and has the ability to harm someone emotionally. To me, that comes off as incredibly condescending and rude to the person doing it, and in general isn't fun for that person.
I also found it really interesting how
SarasaKat backpacked on
Sataric's posts, then
Jacob and
Ness. The main thing I noticed is that they
all went after Tom, even though I suggested the exact same thing. I also want to point out that
Ness said that the
Trojan lynch was a **** lynch, but then voted for
Trojan less than an hour after that post. The scummiest player to me right now appears to be
Ness.
tbh, it was a sh!t lynch before but Trojan is coming off to me as twitchy in post 198 made me change my mind about him. Him saying this is what led me to his vote, and he went offline without explaining a thing. The reasoning I had to calling him a sh!tlynch is because Tom had went all out on him without letting him come in to reply to anything, but then he went off in a really, really short notice by just saying he thought that Tom for wanting to lynch him, and then you Minties for literally no logical reasoning. I also think that him suggesting Kit and Runeraider in post 123 were mostly sh!tlynch candidates to say without them even doing anything, but that doesn't constitute for Trojan anymore since he's here and posting.
Him doing this looks scummy in my eyes, and yes he has plenty of time to write up some justification for this.
Trundle was the only one to not foam at the mouth like the rest of you sheeple following
Sataric to try and look town. Not really sure what angle he's playing at right now, but it seems odd to me that he's playing so reserved and doesn't want to state any of his suspicions. That doesn't really seem to help steer us in the direction of a lynch.
So you're saying that you think that me, SarasaKat, Jacob, and Sataric are all scum and trying to look town?
also please don't rule out
zoolka because they're new. ****ing Gandalf made me scum in my first game ever on TBT.
What should we call you? Minties
What are your preferred pronouns? Attackhelicopterkin (she/her)
What is your time zone? AEST - Australia
Tom why did you want salties back. I can't keep her caged.