we have a new bandwagon growing, most of which used the excuse "i agree..."
It's not a bandwagon. People have been posting reasons for why they changed, even if the posts vary in length.
we have a new bandwagon growing, most of which used the excuse "i agree..."
Uhm...no. You'd just agree and attempt to hide in the shadows. I still think it's dummy.
It's not a bandwagon. People have been posting reasons for why they changed, even if the posts vary in length.
it's silly to think that every person who's been mafia only ever behaves one way.
Half of these posts could easily be shortened to "I agree", as they don't really add anything new.
Might I ask why most of you are being pretty flip floppity with your voting?
Half of these posts could easily be shortened to "I agree", as they don't really add anything new.
Might I ask why most of you are being pretty flip floppity with your voting?
#TRUTH
Seriously though, you pick someone and stick, not change when someone has a reason to vote and then re word what they've said.
#TRUTH
Seriously though, you pick someone and stick, not change when someone has a reason to vote and then re word what they've said.
Isn't this why the Unvote option is there? How come once people are voting for 3DSFan (with reasons) you and Thunder are against it all of a sudden? This doesn't make sense in my opinion.
Isn't this why the Unvote option is there? How come once people are voting for 3DSFan (with reasons) you and Thunder are against it all of a sudden? This doesn't make sense in my opinion.
I'm not against it? I'm against flicking between people to vote for?
Isn't this why the Unvote option is there? How come once people are voting for 3DSFan (with reasons) you and Thunder are against it all of a sudden? This doesn't make sense in my opinion.
Oh okay, that makes more sense then. I agree that people shouldn't change their votes too often without enough reason, but I think the posts I based my change of vote on had good reasoning to them.
We're against folks abusing it. It's fine and dandy to change votes (I'm honestly still reconsidering mine), but you really need to keep it at a minimum.
My main reason was posted on the last page based on the evidence and posts from AndyB and Horus. I'm sure everyone has their own reason, but since you asked a question I have a question for you. You don't have to answer it if you don't want to, but I'd just like to know.
Who do you think is suspicious, and why?
Obviously if you have no opinion on this yet then don't answer, but just putting this out there since (I think) you haven't voted yet.
So much reading to catch up on!
Can anybody fill me in on both sides of the argument?