• Guest, you're invited to help build our new TBT time capsule! It contains three parts, with some of its elements planned to open in 2029 and others not until the distant future of 2034. Get started in 2024 Community Time Capsule: Blueprints.

Mafia TBT Mafia II: Mafia Strike Back [Game Over/Mafia Win]

I think I have to go for 3DSFan134 as well. His overconfidence that Waffles is Mafia is suspicious to me, cause I know she's not. He also visited Mary's (a mafia) profile which may not seem like much, but with all the evidence against him it could be possible that he had a link with her. I'll wait a while for him to defend himself.

- - - Post Merge - - -

has** not had
 
I'm very nervous for the night to end...It's been very exciting!
I'm sure we are all looking forward to it.
 
Uhm...no. You'd just agree and attempt to hide in the shadows. I still think it's dummy.

it's silly to think that every person who's been mafia only ever behaves one way.

It's not a bandwagon. People have been posting reasons for why they changed, even if the posts vary in length.

Half of these posts could easily be shortened to "I agree", as they don't really add anything new.

Might I ask why most of you are being pretty flip floppity with your voting?
 
it's silly to think that every person who's been mafia only ever behaves one way.



Half of these posts could easily be shortened to "I agree", as they don't really add anything new.

Might I ask why most of you are being pretty flip floppity with your voting?



My main reason was posted on the last page based on the evidence and posts from AndyB and Horus. I'm sure everyone has their own reason, but since you asked a question I have a question for you. You don't have to answer it if you don't want to, but I'd just like to know.

Who do you think is suspicious, and why?

Obviously if you have no opinion on this yet then don't answer, but just putting this out there since (I think) you haven't voted yet.
 
Half of these posts could easily be shortened to "I agree", as they don't really add anything new.

Might I ask why most of you are being pretty flip floppity with your voting?

#TRUTH

Seriously though, you pick someone and stick, not change when someone has a reason to vote and then re word what they've said.
 
#TRUTH

Seriously though, you pick someone and stick, not change when someone has a reason to vote and then re word what they've said.

So if your mind changes, you don't say anything?
If you stick to one person the entire game, your digging your own grave.
 
#TRUTH

Seriously though, you pick someone and stick, not change when someone has a reason to vote and then re word what they've said.

Isn't this why the Unvote option is there? How come once people are voting for 3DSFan (with reasons) you and Thunder are against it all of a sudden? This doesn't make sense in my opinion.
 
Not throughout the whole game but people flicking between different people is beyond a joke now. That was the mistakes made in the last game and nearly allowed the mafia to win. People need to start thinking about their votes carefully.
 
Isn't this why the Unvote option is there? How come once people are voting for 3DSFan (with reasons) you and Thunder are against it all of a sudden? This doesn't make sense in my opinion.

i think they mostly mean people who change their votes when someone accuses someone else. you gotta think for yourself
 
Isn't this why the Unvote option is there? How come once people are voting for 3DSFan (with reasons) you and Thunder are against it all of a sudden? This doesn't make sense in my opinion.

I'm not against it? I'm against flicking between people to vote for?
 
I'm not against it? I'm against flicking between people to vote for?

Oh okay, that makes more sense then. I agree that people shouldn't change their votes too often without enough reason, but I think the posts I based my change of vote on had good reasoning to them.
 
Isn't this why the Unvote option is there? How come once people are voting for 3DSFan (with reasons) you and Thunder are against it all of a sudden? This doesn't make sense in my opinion.

We're against folks abusing it. It's fine and dandy to change votes (I'm honestly still reconsidering mine), but you really need to keep it at a minimum.
 
Oh okay, that makes more sense then. I agree that people shouldn't change their votes too often without enough reason, but I think the posts I based my change of vote on had good reasoning to them.

Sorry it's really early here, I don't make sense when tired but yeah people are flicking between people when one person makes a good point and then just simply agreeing or changing words around to look like their own
 
We're against folks abusing it. It's fine and dandy to change votes (I'm honestly still reconsidering mine), but you really need to keep it at a minimum.

Thank you. I will keep this in mind in the future. :)
 
Plus, if you all remember in the last games voting thread, 3DSfan being a pain and doing it a lot... Like tom said, go ahead change your vote but not a ridiculous amount that gives the impression you've not been paying attention and don't know who to vote for. Well that's the impression I get or even using it as a distraction.
 
My main reason was posted on the last page based on the evidence and posts from AndyB and Horus. I'm sure everyone has their own reason, but since you asked a question I have a question for you. You don't have to answer it if you don't want to, but I'd just like to know.

Who do you think is suspicious, and why?

Obviously if you have no opinion on this yet then don't answer, but just putting this out there since (I think) you haven't voted yet.

I'm afraid I don't have a solid enough suspicion on anyone to pursue a lynch at the moment, hence the phoenix wright-esque pressing right now.

3DSFan and Beary are sort of wildcards, I wouldn't put any chips down on either of them because it's really difficult to tell what alignment they are based on their behavior. And I'm not confident in Waffles being mafia as I've shared before, hence my hesitation to put down a vote.
 
Seems the focus has turned from iTookYourWaffles to 3Dsfan... Honestly, his post are suspicious, but if you remember from last game he would always try going after the next person he thought was suspicious. First he was out to get Justin, swearing he was mafia, then after he was killed and revealed a townie, he went for AndyB's throat. And the whole time he was a townie. Not saying he is innocent, but maybe he is using the same (uneffective) tactic he used last game, so he can 'blend' more easily with the town, which makes him more suspicious to everyone else. I really can't tell if the lack of posting is because he's mafia and he can't afford a slip up on their part, or he's a townie and really just doesn't know what to say. Either way, I'd like to hear what he has to say in his defense.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Waffles I hope you have something to say for yourself.
 
So much reading to catch up on!

Can anybody fill me in on both sides of the argument?

Believe me, there's only one side. The accused aren't even defending themselves well enough. We're shifting around through Waffles and 3DSFan.
 
Back
Top