Mafia TBT Mafia III: The Murder Before Christmas [Game Over/Town Win]

beary, I'm glad you're trying to contribute, but you need to give your reasons. Why do you suspect Blu Rose? Why do you suspect me? Why don't you suspect VillageDweller?

I completely forgot about VD! Sorry xD
I do suspect him.
Blu Rose seems like a new mafia, blundering about.

- - - Post Merge - - -



Hahaha umm... Can you give me one example?

I'm on my phone. I can't quote! I can do it tomorrow :p
 
If you mean will I state the number of KP when I ask for actions to be sent in to me, I can do that from now on. In the Night 1 post I did make several mistakes, so if I missed out on posting that I will from now on (it hadn't been pointed out to me either so I thought nothing of it).

In addition, Superpenguin, the KP displayed will not be the true KP (if a Mafioso was incarcerated). No, confirming a decrease in KP following an incarceration will have to be done by working out where all of the hits went.
 
Correction: Should be needed to use last night when talking about the incarceration issue. Was talking in the tense of when the PMs took place.
 
In addition, Superpenguin, the KP displayed will not be the true KP (if a Mafioso was incarcerated). No, confirming a decrease in KP following an incarceration will have to be done by working out where all of the hits went.

Oh, okay, well then it's definitely too risky to try and incarcerate him tonight and see what happens. Seeing as how he tuned down the incarceration as a townie and seeing as how he was the only candidate to receive a random influx of votes without any questioning, I find VD Suspicious enough for me to vote for him.
 
After checking out the evidence against VD, I'm voting for him. It's just too weird to refuse an incarceration if you are a Townie, like he claims. Why would you need it on Night 2? You'll be protected during Night 2 anyways! It also means you can't die during that period of time, so there's no reason to refuse. Can anyone think of a proper reason VD refused?
 
After checking out the evidence against VD, I'm voting for him. It's just too weird to refuse an incarceration if you are a Townie, like he claims. Why would you need it on Night 2? You'll be protected during Night 2 anyways! It also means you can't die during that period of time, so there's no reason to refuse. Can anyone think of a proper reason VD refused?

No, but i also can't think of a proper reason for you to ignore two requests to explain a certain post. The first, you were offline then, the second, you were online
 
After checking out the evidence against VD, I'm voting for him. It's just too weird to refuse an incarceration if you are a Townie, like he claims. Why would you need it on Night 2? You'll be protected during Night 2 anyways! It also means you can't die during that period of time, so there's no reason to refuse. Can anyone think of a proper reason VD refused?

His defense was that he just didn't want to waste it. Which is a very weak explanation considering that he ran for Mayor saying that he wanted protection from death at night!

As Karla did say, I would particularly like the protection. Having died early on in both games is kind of disheartening, so I'd definitely like to stick around more and do more good for the town. :)

Those are his exact words from his post running for Mayor. It is incredibly conflicting that you would say that, but then decline immunity at night because you don't want to waste it. You would be just as equally wasting Mayor.
 
After checking out the evidence against VD, I'm voting for him. It's just too weird to refuse an incarceration if you are a Townie, like he claims. Why would you need it on Night 2? You'll be protected during Night 2 anyways! It also means you can't die during that period of time, so there's no reason to refuse. Can anyone think of a proper reason VD refused?

Maybe if you read my post thoroughly, you would see I listed all the reasons he may have refused. Also, you are incorrect about him being protected during Night 2 too. My offer was to incarcerate him during Night 1 and Day 2.
 
After checking out the evidence against VD, I'm voting for him. It's just too weird to refuse an incarceration if you are a Townie, like he claims. Why would you need it on Night 2? You'll be protected during Night 2 anyways! It also means you can't die during that period of time, so there's no reason to refuse. Can anyone think of a proper reason VD refused?

The only reason I could think of is that he's an Assassin. But you can't rolecheck in prison, so that wouldn't have worked.
 
Assassin should have no problem claiming to me, unless he thinks I'm an assassin too.

It was a weak possibility that that's what he is.

Look, after reading the past few pages, I've got to vote for the lynch of VD. The evidence is too overwhelming.
 
I agree with Oath that Assassin is a possibility. It would explain the Townie claim after implying a blue role.
 
I agree with Oath that Assassin is a possibility. It would explain the Townie claim after implying a blue role.

It's a possibility, but then it doesn't match up with the whole "incarcerate me on night two" thing, because sure he could rolecheck night one, but if he found an Assassin, then he wouldn't be able to kill on night two without seeming suspicious.

- - - Post Merge - - -

hence why I believe if he's Assassin, it's a very stupid move to put off incarceration.
 
By the way, Dolby, I've been exiting out of my 3Ds browser so I'm not tempted to reply to every post and spam. I also had to take a shower the second time. I won't lurk, because I still get tempted.

In short, there's not a lot of reasons VD had to refuse the incarceration. He just put himself in the spotlight by saying "I want it on Night 2". It's he's saying the Mafia's planning a killing spree Night 2.

- - - Post Merge - - -

I forgot to add the "like" in the sentence about the killing spree. But it's weird to be specific that he must have it Night 2, no other time.
 
Hm... Okay I think I have to vote for VD. Refusing a incarantion is really strange, and the choosing another specific time is even stranger. Also, he hasn't really given good defence to support his reasoning.
 
Sorry for a late reply, my internet decided not to cooperate.
----
As for VD, all the evidence is stacked up well. Who on Earth would refuse an incarceration? I would take one, reasoning given or not. The real turning point is what has been brought up already. The election. VD said he wanted protection and didn't want to die. PM: I don't want protection, I don't think I'll die. Obviously, VD has an action role (not a Townie or a Veteran). The PM exchange does not line up with the election whatsoever IMO. Who would really want to use their abilities at night in the beginning? A Mafia or an Assassin. The Assassin scenario has been thrown out with Oath's reasoning. What's left? Mafia. My vote is going in for him.
----
As for Blu Rose, we should stay away from him in the meantime. The arguments against aren't too good. This is probably just a beginner's move, but if the distractions keep on coming, we NEED to get rid of it.
 
I've read through the posts and i think that vd is a better lynch canidate then Kippla, if he turns up something different then i'm probably voting for Karla tomarrow
 
Honestly there has been many good evidence against VillageDweller but I think I'm going to wait a little longer.
 
Back
Top