• Guest, you're invited to help build our new TBT time capsule! It contains three parts, with some of its elements planned to open in 2029 and others not until the distant future of 2034. Get started in 2024 Community Time Capsule: Blueprints.

Mafia TBT Mafia XII: Mean Girls (GAME OVER THREE WAY TIE)

I don't why everyone is throwing accusations at each other when we have almost no evidence against anyone. We'd be better off lynching an inactive player. If they're Scum, good for us. If they're Town, they're obviously not trying to make a case and help us. I really can't point a finger at any player in particular yet.
 
If were lynching an inactive may I suggest Beardo. She hasn't posted anything really useful at all. And I've seen them viewing the thread a lot.
 
If were lynching an inactive may I suggest Beardo. She hasn't posted anything really useful at all. And I've seen them viewing the thread a lot.

He was viewing the thread while, and after you said that too, lol.
 
If were lynching an inactive may I suggest Beardo. She hasn't posted anything really useful at all. And I've seen them viewing the thread a lot.

That's who I was gonna vote for. Or Aerouis (probs didn't spell right) because they already got 2 votes.

There's like no evidence on anyone at this point of the game. Lynching someone inactive seems like the best route to go
 
Hello! I just woke up an hour ago, then I had chores and stuff. The only reason it shows me viewing the thread is because I keep the tab open on my ipad. I have started gathering what little evidence there is though.
 
That's who I was gonna vote for. Or Aerouis (probs didn't spell right) because they already got 2 votes.

I don't have two votes and I'm not inactive. Pls don't bandwagon on your votes without sufficient evidence. ^^
 
I've only seen one so far. Where's the other one? Either way it's kinda funny considering that I'm substitute and not even maf.

##Vote: Aerious

##VOTE: Aerious

Okay so the inactives are posting and apologizing for their inactivity. Some have said they will post later, but how much time do we give them? We only have 5 hours left, it's not like we can wait for the rest of the day to see if they try or not idk

- - - Post Merge - - -

well river hasnt said anything but i dont feel safe lynching her day 1
 
I'd say we give the inactives an hour or two to post?
That gives us a good 4 or 3 hours to decide on who to lynch, which seems like good enough time frame.
 
why is that?
Well others have mentioned lynching SP, Oath, Alice and Sataric and I consider them all strong players y'know. We don't really have much evidence on all 4 of them, so it will be taking a risk to lynch a player who can help us in the long run. River is a good player as well and I'm guessing she must be caught up with something irl to explain for her inactivity? idk
 
So Superpenguin has voted for Aerious and has not given a reason to as why he/she voted for them

Uh, he's been doing that in "and then there were none" too. Oath keeps calling him out on it.

Oh I though he who only did that in "and then there were none", but he does that in all mafia games?

Not all, but I'm suspicious of him in that game because of it.

Everyone thinks we should lynch an inactive. Pally suggested we lynch oath2order.
Mkay

I'm rolling my eyes at this.

well river hasnt said anything but i dont feel safe lynching her day 1

Well that's particularly interesting.


I'm not so sure how I feel about the Aerious lynch. She's a newbie to forum mafia, which makes me want to give her the benefit of the doubt, but she does play IRC mafia and I think Epic Mafia so I think her skills there would translate here. But she's acting like a dingus.
 
I'm not so sure how I feel about the Aerious lynch. She's a newbie to forum mafia, which makes me want to give her the benefit of the doubt, but she does play IRC mafia and I think Epic Mafia so I think her skills there would translate here. But she's acting like a dingus.
SP should know my role because he was in IRC at the time that I said it, so I think it's kinda ironic that he's voting for me. I made it clear that I am A SUBSTITUTE. This makes me a little suspicious as of why he's voting for me with no cause whatsoever.
 
SP should know my role because he was in IRC at the time that I said it, so I think it's kinda ironic that he's voting for me. I made it clear that I am A SUBSTITUTE. This makes me a little suspicious as of why he's voting for me with no cause whatsoever.

No, I wasn't. Gee, you think everyone was in the IRC when you said your role. You probably private messaged yourself that role and thought you were posting for all to see. I never saw your role. If I wa seven in the IRC at that time, I wasn't paying attention.
 
SP should know my role because he was in IRC at the time that I said it, so I think it's kinda ironic that he's voting for me. I made it clear that I am A SUBSTITUTE. This makes me a little suspicious as of why he's voting for me with no cause whatsoever.

What exactly is a substitute?
 
No, I wasn't. Gee, you think everyone was in the IRC when you said your role. You probably private messaged yourself that role and thought you were posting for all to see. I never saw your role. If I wa seven in the IRC at that time, I wasn't paying attention.
I said it IRC straight up. You're voting me without no reason. Bandwagoning?

- - - Post Merge - - -

What exactly is a substitute?
I'm veteran. I'm a townie.
 
Back
Top