• Guest, can you feel the love in the air? Valentine's Week at The Bell Tree has begun with a new mini-event featuring four activities to enjoy -- new and returning collectibles are up for grabs! Dive in to the love here.

Mafia TBT Nomination Mafia: 7 Player Micro-DAY 1- ends Monday 10 PM EST

1. Calamity had made all of his posts before you posted rqs
2. I meant not sounding like something a town would say
I told toad to make content by asking for his opinion of me.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Antonio’s WIFOM is also a major red flag
 
Now, I really believe it is either Punchy or Toad who is scum atm. However, Punchy response seems legit and feels like he is actually trying to explain his accusation (even if I still got some questions.) However, I believe Toad is the scummiest at the moment.

I would like to say, that the REQs I provided were not the best. I did agree with Toad on that and think his REQs were much better. I'm not the best with REQs so it was nice that he provided different ones. However, I didn't like how he decides that my statements are acceptable.

Sorry but bad answers like that will not be accepted, if you are not a newbie and played in a few games then you should be able to describe your approach and processes to these games to some degree for question 3.

And question 4 is meant to ask that question early. What do you think of calamity so far

Now, I get that my answers wasn't really much BUT there really wasn't much to work with. There is literally 4 people active (Toad, Me, Punchy, and Calamity) and it really feels like there really isn't much conversation to work with. It was early in the game and using my gameplay depends on the actions of others early on. I usually don't go in with some gameplan but that is me personally.

I don't want to be force making decisions about others (thinking who I think is scum) until I notice something scummy. Stating that my answer (That it is too early on to decide who is scum) isn't acceptable is just quite controlling. I'm not gonna say someone is scummy if I don't tHink someone is scummy. Especially when half the people aren't really active.

Now, check out this quote:

A bad answer is one that doesn't answer the question... so anyone can judge that not me.

And I don't care if its too early to have a strategy. If everyone played like that then mafia games would be sitting around doing nothing.

I do this all the time, tell people how to play this game because honestly everyone who plays right now is utter poop. I said I was gonna do this in the original post too... so don't know why this is a surprise. Someone has to say something or otherwise you noobs will just fade into oblivion, like every other game

I'm not a noob. I have played many games and I usually is very undecided during the early stages of a game.

I have more to say but I have this 500 word essay due about Womans Rights in early History due by midnight which I haven't started on. Therefore, I have much time to add more. Here is my final statement:

I believe Toad is deciding what is right or wrong when I have stated my REQs as honest as possible. Just because you are the most experience one here, doesn't mean you are the only who "has to say something" (or said something). I will be voting off an inactive user, imtherhino because I want more time to think about this and see who is align to who.

- - - Post Merge - - -

1. Calamity had made all of his posts before you posted rqs
2. I meant not sounding like something a town would say
I told toad to make content by asking for his opinion of me.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Antonio’s WIFOM is also a major red flag

1. Not sure how that explains much but Thank you for explaining... <3
 
Day 1 Results:

Nobody will be lynched today. After careful consideration of posts, I have decided that dragonboy will be replaced.


Please note, I will be lenient on the voting today since there are modkills. But those who do not vote next day is instantly modkilled as well. And I will strictly enforce three substantial post per day and no questions asked, will be modkilled.
 
Last edited:
Please welcome Dolby as replacement for Dragonboy.

The players are still 8. Day 2 will be very strict . Rules

1) three (substantial) post minimum
2) must vote at end of day

Day 2 ends Thursday 10 pm EST
 
Last edited:
Welcome Dolby. Rhino, you came out of nowhere out of a sudden and voted. Same with hyrule.

- - - Post Merge - - -

This game is dead nd I have been too distracted with my midterms. REplace me, i'm out.
 
Welcome Dolby. Rhino, you came out of nowhere out of a sudden and voted. Same with hyrule.

- - - Post Merge - - -

This game is dead nd I have been too distracted with my midterms. REplace me, i'm out.

Please do it the right way and pm me
 
Hey, how you'll doing?

Antonio/Hyrule STRONG scum team equity but I'm way more sus of Hyrule for that last second vote. Especially considering that she hasn't explained why she did so in any satisfactory way and it would have kept the lynch off of Antonio. Hyrule's vote would've saved Antonio should he have been scum, was a straight piggyback off of Antonio, and occurred without explanation. I actually consider this abnormal behavior from Hyrule should they be town, because last game after me and Heyden voted Dragon, he didn't switch off of JT to join us (ftr, no one was on JT when he voted on JT that game). Here and now he's radio silent in the motivations behind his vote

Moreover, the timing between their two votes was so bad, literally seven minutes apart. I could totally see it being a hero vote that Antonio was urging in scum chat to save him from Punchy

I have a solid TL on I'mtherhino right now because he has strong anti-aligns with Antonio and Hyrule

I want to say that Toads being triggered by the bad rqs is town indicative tbh (though I do agree, the only remotely good part about it was "do you prefer maf or town")

Tbh, I was going in thinking that Toads and Punchy were either scum or in a "attack anything that moves" mode, but I've definetely come to be wary of Antonio outside of Hyrule's save vote. His answer's to basic questions and reads have thus far shown at best a desire to not read beneath the surface meaning of posts and at worst to not provide evidence. He attacks Punchy for Punchy being on him (I at least see some logic for him being wary of Toads), has no reasoning for his townreads (namely Calamity), and piggybacks onto the idea of lynching an inactive noob. I want to say that Calamity/Antonio is not a likely team because Antonio piggybacked strongly and very suddenly on the ideas presented here

- who you think is scum
No answer as of yet, but I would say voting off one of the newer players who hasn't said much is the most logical step, since the newer players have hardly contributed, and if it's a town voteoff, it wouldn't affect the town's strategizing too much, just the numbers. If I could, I'd encourage everybody to go novote, but that's against the rules of this game.

Which I don't think is a situation that occurs when both are mafia

His post deciding to go for Imtherhino is iffy at best. He opens saying that he views Toads as his strongest scumlean, but is considerably null and non-commital throughout, and seems to come of the conclusion tht Toads is null at the end, then decides to pull a name out of a hat and go on Rhino.

My brain is all over the place but I'll try to format this in a way that makes sense

Now, I really believe it is either Punchy or Toad who is scum atm. However, Punchy response seems legit and feels like he is actually trying to explain his accusation (even if I still got some questions.) However, I believe Toad is the scummiest at the moment.
Going from this, saying he's scumleaning
I believe Toad is deciding what is right or wrong when I have stated my REQs as honest as possible. Just because you are the most experience one here, doesn't mean you are the only who "has to say something" (or said something). I will be voting off an inactive user, imtherhino because I want more time to think about this and see who is align to who.
To this, saying that he's genuinely deciding what's right or wrong, is NOT a good look, and reveals that Antonio can't actually produce substance for his reads

Cal:


Tbh, I believe he is Town now as of this post.

Such as here. This is not provided out of context. Antonio has not provided any reasoning for his read on Cal here and it honestly seems like he's surcumbing to a pressure to TL him despite the people telling him that Cal's town are his two scumreads

Toad:


Plus there is quite hyprocrisy in that statement because you haven't talked about others aswell.
I'll admit that Toads doesn't have a lot of content, but all of your reasoning is in reaction to his SL on you


However, despite all this, I'm gonna vote Hyrule.[ She has demonstrated stronger differences from her past behavior as town. Her only posts have been in response to RQS questions, and this softball question thrown to her by Antonio which he utterly failed to hit

Opinions on what? The game?

He just leaves on that and save votes Antonio. The interaction is awkward and feels like a way to just interact on Antonio's part, but last game she was able to put out far better content. What triggers me more though is the saving vote on Antonio. She's stated no opinion on him throughout the game, and that vote isn't a vote to lynch Rhino, even if Hyrule is town, it's a vote to keep Antonio alive. He leaves without commenting to.

- - - Post Merge - - -

It's because Dolby and Dad aren't here lol

I'm here LMAO

- - - Post Merge - - -

Gonna make a actual ISO on Antonio because this definetely doesn't show my biggest grievences with his behavior well. Hold on
 
I claim as Mafia. **** getting a replacement because this game irrates me on so many levels.

I can't play a game where Bianca decides to change the rules just because no one is fricking active. I have wasted so much time on this ****ing game DURING MIDTERMS and I hate getting too involved with this game. What irrates is that Bianca stated in the main post

-On odd-numbered Days, normal lynching mechanics apply.

BUT OH WAIT, IT DIDN'T! THE VOTES DIDN'T APPLY AT ALL. Just because only a few voted doesn't mean the votes are useless. I wasn't asking for a replacement because I had midterms, I ask for a replacement because I can't play this game anymore. Plus, all these new people are joining in but aren't frickin contributing to **** irrates me. I totally understand if you are busy but why sign up for a game if you ain't even gonna post?

The fact that day 1 votes didn't count ruined our plan for Mafia even when you stated that regular lynching counts. It seems unfair for the both of us that you decided to not make it count when we had this plan discussed and thought out.

I'm out. Have a nice day!
 
Ok it's Antonio/Hyrule

Let's get em

- - - Post Merge - - -

I def symphatize with Antonio's frustration btw, but when you have to modkill two town, let the lynch, and let mafia choose between three town to be lynched the next day I think that would've been instaloss, which would've been an even worse situation than how she chose to do it
 
I'm sorry for being angry, I just needed to vent on this. It seems like this decision favored Town over mafia and it totally made it easier for town to win.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Ok it's Antonio/Hyrule

Let's get em

- - - Post Merge - - -

I def symphatize with Antonio's frustration btw, but when you have to modkill two town, let the lynch, and let mafia choose between three town to be lynched the next day I think that would've been instaloss, which would've been an even worse situation than how she chose to do it


This was the gameplay:

We need to also go by our win condition: "You win when you control 50% of the town." That means we have to vote off 3 town users, even if one of us is killed.

So, there are 6 town members in total.

Day 1 - Eliminates one (by regular vote)
Night 1 - Eliminates one (That we pick)
Day 2 - Eliminates one (by regular vote) (If day 1 and night 1 eliminates a

If we could survive to Day 2 (the both of us), then we win automatically.

If one of us gets voted off during Day 2, we can still technically win during night 2 if day 1 and night 1 lynches were both Towns since the members will be forced to pick a town member (if one of us picks all 3 town members). That will make the day 1 town killed, night 1 town killed, and the night 2 kill that they were forced to pick a town member.

We should pick 3 town members for night 1, not us. It's still early in the game so there can't be a solid decision for who is mafia.

WE NEED TO SURVIVE DAY 1.V

The fact that my parent is barely active makes everything seems worse.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Ok it's Antonio/Hyrule

Let's get em

- - - Post Merge - - -

I def symphatize with Antonio's frustration btw, but when you have to modkill two town, let the lynch, and let mafia choose between three town to be lynched the next day I think that would've been instaloss, which would've been an even worse situation than how she chose to do it

Bianca could've not modkilled anyone and just voted off rhino.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Like it stated in the vote.
 
The fact that my parent is barely active makes everything seems worse.

- - - Post Merge - - -



Bianca could've not modkilled anyone and just voted off rhino.

I'm not trying to be a dick, but this was also supposed to be nightless, with the even numbered days kinda acting like the scum kills, so the plan was flawed

tbh, that would've also been acceptable, but let's be real here, in the world where hyrule is your partner he kinda gave the whole game away

- - - Post Merge - - -

Oh wait, you kinda did account for that
 
I'm not trying to be a dick, but this was also supposed to be nightless, with the even numbered days kinda acting like the scum kills, so the plan was flawed

tbh, that would've also been acceptable, but let's be real here, in the world where hyrule is your partner he kinda gave the whole game away

- - - Post Merge - - -

Oh wait, you kinda did account for that

Yes, but we picking who the votes were could have stilled work. It's just so frustrating when a decision made by the host goes against what he states in the main post.

- - - Post Merge - - -

and it effects mafia deeply.
 
In the world where Rhino lynched (leaving 5v2), I replace, and D2 is decided between three town(probably me, Toads, Punchy)(leaving 4v2), that still does leave you needing to survive D3.

But yeah, I do agree, you basically had no nightkill
 
Still though, I would be VERY disappointed in any town that didn't have Antonio and Hyrule as top scum picks after that EoD

- - - Post Merge - - -

I'd honestly call the game off here because Antonio basically revealed his teammate is Hyrule here
 
In the world where Rhino lynched (leaving 5v2), I replace, and D2 is decided between three town(probably me, Toads, Punchy)(leaving 4v2), that still does leave you needing to survive D3.

But yeah, I do agree, you basically had no nightkill

The objective was to control 50% of the people, which means voting off 3 town members.
 
Back
Top