Thank you for the respectful reply - I know this election was really intense for a lot of reasons and I sincerely appreciate being able to go back and forth with someone about it without overt hostility.
And yes, I absolutely don't think that Trump's adherents were going to swing to Harris somehow. (Like I said, I agree with you that she should have taken more hardline progressive stances to win more votes instead of trying to reassure anxious conservative voters, since that train had already left the station by the time she knew she was running.) However, I don't think it's accurate to say that only staunch Trump voters are influenced by racism and sexism. I don't think liberal/progressive voters are free of those biases either and I definitely think that they influenced the rapid willingness that so many democrats showed to say "well, wait a minute--does the Vice President of the US REALLY have any experience, though?"
I also do think that more moderate voters still exist; for example, my parents were generally Republican while I was growing up, but have never voted for Trump because he's just way too off the rails for them. And I think that people like that, who are really uncomfortable with his rhetoric but also don't consider themselves loyal Democrats, are subconsciously influenced by our widespread cultural fear of what will happen if a woman is in a position of power. It also provides an additional justification for those who calm their voting anxiety by simply not voting.
At the end of the day, though, neither of us can prove our opinions. You can't prove that none of the stay-out-of-it voters would have otherwise voted for Biden or another white male candidate, and I can't prove that a large number of those voters were influenced by the prejudices they hold. We're both just analyzing the current political climate, and there's probably truth to both stances. I'm sure there is a strong contingent of voters, especially young voters, who would have protested Biden by refusing to vote for him a second time, I just don't think I'm convinced that those people swung the election. But yeah, many intersecting factors--the situation with the mail-in ballots is absolutely alarming and I'm sure Harris is missing many legitimate votes, though perhaps not enough votes to actually have a majority. I also genuinely suspect online election interference since we've already seen it in previous elections--online accounts posing as progressives insisting that young people should refrain from voting for Harris because she'll [X] or doesn't care enough about [Y], even when Trump would be proudly, unequivocally worse for human rights on those issues. I'm sure there's a lot going on behind the scenes that neither you nor I have any way of seeing.
(The name thing is that it's extremely common for journalists and political commentators to refer to female candidates by their first names while using last names for all male candidates, which is a subtle way of making the female candidates seem less formal/serious/professional and very much bleeds into public vernacular. Hillary is the most excusable imo, since we had another recent Clinton president, but it's an overarching trend and once I noticed it, I saw it everywhere.)
Anyway, thanks again for the back and forth! I don't want to derail this whole thread, so I'm going to stop with the election posts now, but feel free to reply if you want.