Harry Potter Hype

[DarthGohan1]

I think both Harry and Voldemort die.

 

[ac1983fan]

I read a theory somewere that said that lupin could actually be James, and they did a switching spell. but it was like in a book that anylised the book 1-4.

 

[Kyle]

So when Harry grows up to like 40, is he still gonna have a broom? :S

Thats MY cliffhanger.

 

[DarthGohan1]

Hmmmm.... Rowling has been quoted saying there was a reason he had to die. What if Harry & Voldemort sorta kill each other at the same time, and Sirius like oulls Voldemort into hell, and Harry is pulled into heaven by his parents?

 

[Kyle]

Hmmmm.... Rowling has been quoted saying there was a reason he had to die. What if Harry & Voldemort sorta kill each other at the same time, and Sirius like oulls Voldemort into hell, and Harry is pulled into heaven by his parents?

Wellllllllll... why would Voldemort try to kill Harry then?

Maybe he could get revived by a Horcrux or something...

 

[DarthGohan1]

I read a theory somewere that said that lupin could actually be James, and they did a switching spell. but it was like in a book that anylised the book 1-4.

nope

http://www.jkrowling.com/textonly/en/faq_view.cfm?id=60

 

[Grawr]

Wait a minute, wait a minute, I'm not really a big Harry Potter fan, and I didn't read the whole thread, but they're gonna' kill off Harry Potter? =O

 

[Bulerias]

Wait a minute, wait a minute, I'm not really a big Harry Potter fan, and I didn't read the whole thread, but they're gonna' kill off Harry Potter? =O

We don't know for sure.

 

[Grawr]

Wait a minute, wait a minute, I'm not really a big Harry Potter fan, and I didn't read the whole thread, but they're gonna' kill off Harry Potter? =O

We don't know for sure.

Why would we even be thinking that? They wouldn't kill off the main character...

Right?

 

[Kyle]

Wait a minute, wait a minute, I'm not really a big Harry Potter fan, and I didn't read the whole thread, but they're gonna' kill off Harry Potter? =O

We don't know for sure.

Why would we even be thinking that? They wouldn't kill off the main character...

Right?

Its possible, Ive seen it happen before.

 

[Grawr]

Wait a minute, wait a minute, I'm not really a big Harry Potter fan, and I didn't read the whole thread, but they're gonna' kill off Harry Potter? =O

We don't know for sure.

Why would we even be thinking that? They wouldn't kill off the main character...

Right?

Its possible, Ive seen it happen before.

A main character as famous as Harry Potter, though?

 

[Bulerias]

J.K. Rowling herself said, "It'd be one way to kill off the merchandising.", so I dunno. Personally speaking, I don't think he'll die.

 

[Grawr]

J.K. Rowling herself said, "It'd be one way to kill off the merchandising.", so I dunno. Personally speaking, I don't think he'll die.

Nor do I.

 

[Bulerias]

J.K. Rowling herself said, "It'd be one way to kill off the merchandising.", so I dunno. Personally speaking, I don't think he'll die.

Nor do I.

If anyone's going to die, it's gonna be Snape trying to protect Harry. Or, of course, we shall see Wormtail fulfill the life debt he has to Harry.

 

[DarthGohan1]

J.K. Rowling herself said, "It'd be one way to kill off the merchandising.", so I dunno.

 

[Bulerias]

J.K. Rowling herself said, "It'd be one way to kill off the merchandising.", so I dunno. Personally speaking, I don't think he'll die.

Nor do I.

If anyone's going to die, it's gonna be Snape trying to protect Harry. Or, of course, we shall see Wormtail fulfill the life debt he has to Harry.

i dont think snape will ned up good

There's a REALLY good article I was just reading that only reconfirmed my theory of Snape turning out good.

http://www.mugglenet.com/editorials/editor...llister01.shtml

 

[DarthGohan1]

Very well written article, indeed, but I must disagree.

Snape has never been a cold-blooded killer... so why would he randomly kill someone like Flitwick or Hermione? By not killing them, it leaves the possibility that he is actually on the good side.

Also, when Hagrid said, "What musta happened was, Dumbledore musta told Snape ter go with them Death Eaters," Hagrid said confidently. "I suppose he

 

[Kyle]

J.K. Rowling herself said, "It'd be one way to kill off the merchandising.", so I dunno.

 

[Bulerias]

Very well written article, indeed, but I must disagree.

Snape has never been a cold-blooded killer... so why would he randomly kill someone like Flitwick or Hermione? By not killing them, it leaves the possibility that he is actually on the good side.

Also, when Hagrid said, "What musta happened was, Dumbledore musta told Snape ter go with them Death Eaters," Hagrid said confidently. "I suppose he

 

[Bulerias]

J.K. Rowling herself said, "It'd be one way to kill off the merchandising.", so I dunno. Personally speaking, I don't think he'll die.

Nor do I.

If anyone's going to die, it's gonna be Snape trying to protect Harry. Or, of course, we shall see Wormtail fulfill the life debt he has to Harry.

i dont think snape will ned up good

There's a REALLY good article I was just reading that only reconfirmed my theory of Snape turning out good.

http://www.mugglenet.com/editorials/editor...llister01.shtml

The part of the Unbreakable Vow Snape made made the most since to me. And how Ron explained it. It makes alot of sense, but you'd just have to see what happens in the book to be sure anyway.

You see, though, I'm sure Snape did NOT expect the Unbreakable Vow. In fact, notice the subtle hint of Snape's reluctance to accept it, with the hand twitching? However, with company like Bellatrix, he couldn't have denied the request of Malfoy's mother, could he? It would be too obvious he was on Dumbledore's side, then.

So basically, what Snape did was fulfill the Unbreakable Vow, though I am 100% positive that he killed Dumbledore on Dumbledore's orders!