Guys, back off beary a little, this is simply a repeat of game 2. Attacking her and putting her on tilt isn't going to help pin her role down.
I'm looking at the votelist
Now, look at this influx of votes in the final hour. I am confident that at least two out of those highlighted players are Mafia. Pretty sure Mafia aren't brave enough to throw in the final vote, or even the second last vote. However, the continuation of votes even after the threshold was reached shows that people simply aren't paying attention to the vote count. I assume we can use votes cast after the threshold as evidence, even if the votes technically didn't count.
With that in mind, we have Blu Rose, You and Jeremy who continued to throw votes in, on a very easy bandwagon to jump on. My list of names to look at are therefore
BellBringerGreen
Beary509
Tom
SirGanatar
Justin
Prin
Blu Rose
You
Jeremy
Yep, it's a big list, but we can trim it a little.
I'm going to
remove Justin first, because he's an experienced player and is likely to be tracking the vote counts quite closely and won't want to put the second last nail in Dolby's coffin if he was scum. We also did discuss this before, so the idea to lynch Dolby was always on his mind.
Beary is already on everyone's s***list, she's the easiest frame of Mafia's life. Checking her is a waste.
Most of the people (plus Blu Rose) who voted before the threshold did post reasons (of varying strengths) for their votes, but You and Jeremy didn't explain their votes in the thread, and threw in their vote almost as an afterthought. Both players are new and have not been that invested in the game so far, so we really have no behavioural information to go on there. Keep in mind what I posted above though, regarding an easy wagon to hop on.
Tom posted no reason for his vote, later justifying it with Dolby's lack of defence.
Minor thing to note in Ganatar's lynch reason:
Many will know that I view a half-hearted vote with some suspicion.
Anyway, tl;dr we should focus on that list of people and clear/condemn them asap, through checks, behavioural analysis and even vig shots on some of scummier-looking lurkers. I don't want a near-repeat of Game III where lynn and Horus were both chronically inactive scum and made it into the late game, leaving town with little information to judge them on.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Well let's objectively compare the setup in this game with the setup of game III. No elected roles, which really matters little. The core principles of not just trusting people remain intact, regardless of whether there's a Mayor or not. In this game, as with game III, there are a lot of disruptive roles. The lesson people should have taken away from game III is not that town needs a plan (there's no way to come up with a foolproof plan in such a setup), it's that town needs to get discussion going around a plan, and derive information from how people contribute and respond to such a plan. It's not the plan itself that is useful, it's the planning stage.
Also yes, I've been wasting my life away on Rust