• Guest, you're invited to help build our new TBT time capsule! It contains three parts, with some of its elements planned to open in 2029 and others not until the distant future of 2034. Get started in 2024 Community Time Capsule: Blueprints.

Mafia TBT Mini Mafia IX: This One's for the Birds! [Game Over]

Ashtot confirmed Fool.

Anyways, after being on the same Scum Team as Dolby during Tom's game, I have gained much respect for him - He's certainly not as inactive as he makes it out to be, and he's a very sharp individual. And with that, I've grown to realize that lynching him on Day 1 is actually rather foolish. Yes, it's very difficult to figure out if he's good or evil, that cannot be denied - But if he's on the Town team, he adds tons of value for us. He can figure out most people's roles quite accurately just by the way they behave.

He's been great scum in the past, but he is practically useless as town. This gives us more of a reason to lynch him day 1.

I'd like to know where Ash's list came from. I'm also okay with lynching them, but if it's a list of newbies there are some people I do have to question why he didn't include.

Basically people that don't contribute or post bare minimum. Purpl has shown that he is at least capable of things that can benefit town (although it doesn't happen often).
 
Kiss why was I quoyed in your post.

Also thats really a bit of an overreaction. We're just throwing out ideas
 
You're one to talk about joking, asshat. Not to mention you don't bring anything worthwhile to the table either. Most of the information you use is just rehashed with a little bit of your horrible flair added to it. At least in Pleasure Cruise I was in the top 6 posters. Also in Supernatural I helped in some part lynch Kaiaa who was godfather at the time AND I was second in command with Jer in Tina's mafia where I was telling him who YOU should check. Just because I don't post a lot in the thread doesn't mean I'm not working my ass off in PMs or through the IRC.
And if you do work through PMs, it would be nice to say something about it. And for the record, just because you are in the top 6 posters DOES NOT mean you are contributing. Superpenguin was the top poster in Pleasure Cruise in Day 1, and he was just spamming away. Also, am I the only one who sees this as overly defensive?
 
You're one to talk about joking, asshat. Not to mention you don't bring anything worthwhile to the table either. Most of the information you use is just rehashed with a little bit of your horrible flair added to it. At least in Pleasure Cruise I was in the top 6 posters. Also in Supernatural I helped in some part lynch Kaiaa who was godfather at the time AND I was second in command with Jer in Tina's mafia where I was telling Her who YOU should check. Just because I don't post a lot in the thread doesn't mean I'm not working my ass off in PMs or through the IRC.

Kiss why was I quoyed in your post.

Also thats really a bit of an overreaction. We're just throwing out ideas

I'm on my phone and I must've tapped the multi quote thing.

But I'm just tired of Purpl acting like he's hot **** when he's not. At all.
 
And if you do work through PMs, it would be nice to say something about it. And for the record, just because you are in the top 6 posters DOES NOT mean you are contributing. Superpenguin was the top poster in Pleasure Cruise in Day 1, and he was just spamming away. Also, am I the only one who sees this as overly defensive?
*If you do, not and if you do.
 
And if you do work through PMs, it would be nice to say something about it. And for the record, just because you are in the top 6 posters DOES NOT mean you are contributing. Superpenguin was the top poster in Pleasure Cruise in Day 1, and he was just spamming away. Also, am I the only one who sees this as overly defensive?

If you look really hard and very carefully, you'll notice I'm not being overly defensive to anyone but YOU. Why? Take that as what you will.
 
Natty;3141147 This is a weird role. I don't know exactly what to do but I guess I'll role claim as the [B said:
chickie[/B]. Guess I won't be around for long in this game :D
This gives me an idea about how to quickly win the game, being a completely open set-up with even townies having unique names
1. Wait twelve hours to see if there is a conflicting chickie claim
2. If there is, we lynch one of the chickies
3. A.If we lynch the real chickie, then we kill the other chickie claim (or the owl can tell us if the chickie being lynched is a chickie or not)
B. If we lynch the fake chickie then we all roleclaim to Natty
4. Natty tells us whose claims conflict
5. Easily win the game
 
If we're actually looking at people to lynch, MissNoodle could be our best candidate when it comes down to it. Her post quality is sub-par and the only time she really posts is late at night/early morning. But as of right now, I'm leaning more towards a no lynch. More people need to post in here before I can can actually come to a decision.
 
I also want to mention that Ill be gone for most of the 8th, going to Pride Fest in dc.

Dolby what if Natty doesn't get a conflicting chickie claim and she doesnt die?
 
I also want to mention that Ill be gone for most of the 8th, going to Pride Fest in dc.

Dolby what if Natty doesn't get a conflicting chickie claim and she doesnt die?

Well, there is no reason for the real chickie not to claim in the thread, in fact, it is the best thing to do because a. You have no chance of being killed by the mafia and b. We catch a mafia member.

But if she doesn't die then we immediately lynch her and disregard everything that she told us and have to live through the scum team knowing all of our roles
 
But if she doesn't die then we immediately lynch her and disregard everything that she told us and have to live through the scum team knowing all of our roles

yes this sounds like a very good plan tell the mafia everyones roles
how about no thanks

also in harry potter mafia wasn't there like the same thing..? i think it would take more than the time for the chickie (i hope Natty really is xo) has till their death to figure out who and who isn't lying
 
Yeah. Just throwing the possibility to ya

it is a highly improbable possibility, but thanks for bringing it up. I feel like it is the only thing that could go wrong with this plan, also, since this is plurality voting, we could pile slightly less then half of the votes on on one person claiming (if there is a fake claim) and slightly more then half on the other so that the owl could say if the person with more votes on then is scum or not. There is a possibility that natty is fake claiming chickie, but I doubt that scum would sacrifice a member this early in the game, but it is still a possibility, that's a reason why I didn't suggest just outright claiming to natty before somebody suggests

- - - Post Merge - - -

yes this sounds like a very good plan tell the mafia everyones roles
how about no thanks

also in harry potter mafia wasn't there like the same thing..? i think it would take more than the time for the chickie (i hope Natty really is xo) has till their death to figure out who and who isn't lying
Well, she could just tell us whose claims conflicted then go from there in the thread before she dies
 
This gives me an idea about how to quickly win the game, being a completely open set-up with even townies having unique names
1. Wait twelve hours to see if there is a conflicting chickie claim
2. If there is, we lynch one of the chickies
3. A.If we lynch the real chickie, then we kill the other chickie claim (or the owl can tell us if the chickie being lynched is a chickie or not)
B. If we lynch the fake chickie then we all roleclaim to Natty
4. Natty tells us whose claims conflict
5. Easily win the game
What if there isn't a conflicting chickie claim?
 
I also want to mention that Ill be gone for most of the 8th, going to Pride Fest in dc.

Dolby what if Natty doesn't get a conflicting chickie claim and she doesnt die?

Well, there is no reason for the real chickie not to claim in the thread, in fact, it is the best thing to do because a. You have no chance of being killed by the mafia and b. We catch a mafia member.

But if she doesn't die then we immediately lynch her and disregard everything that she told us and have to live through the scum team knowing all of our roles


how ironic

then i guess dolby would want us to go ahead with his plan? i still don't think there would be enough time for natty anyway but whatever
 
What if there isn't a conflicting chickie claim?

If there isn't a conflicting chickie claim then we all roleclaim to natty. In my opinion, only the least caring of players (if they were a chickie) would not try catch natty in a potential fake claim
 
omg i hate myself i forgot to the other quote
What if there isn't a conflicting chickie claim?

- - - Post Merge - - -

omg i wanted to double post as well but dolby ninjad me OMG

- - - Post Merge - - -

If there isn't a conflicting chickie claim then we all roleclaim to natty. In my opinion, only the least caring of players (if they were a chickie) would not try catch natty in a potential fake claim

yes but even so if they didn't die then they are lying (PROBABLY MAFIA) and then the mafia would know all of our roles??? you even said this
 
Back
Top