Mafia The Murder of Woodpines Oregon - Game Thread - Endgame

[illunie]

though i also feel that ness would add a newbie in the mix too.

are the team players chosen or picked through random chance? im pretty sure i already know the answer but just to make sure

- - - Post Merge - - -

are u actually kidding me

 

[toadsworthy]

The "content" statement was a joke....

placeholder votes are the dumbest **** I've ever seen. If you say "I'll come back and change it" then wtf, just come back in the first place and make a real vote. Or you forget to change it and you vote yourself giving absolutely nothing to anything. I'm not saying Waffles is scum or town by it, but like its just stupid because its a piss-poor play as mafia and its a confusing play if she is town.

- - - Post Merge - - -

toads, don't you think this is just a bit too much?

No, because it perfectly sums up why I did it

- - - Post Merge - - -

i'm looking at punchy's behavior as something possible from both angles. i could relate to it as town wanting to improve but i dont recall punchy playing as mafia before so i cant really compare that aspect to anything. i also feel that a punchy train could be easily started by scum, but at the same time i'm still somewhat conflicted on his alignment cause basing a player's mindset using my own is fatal. at the moment i think his lynch may be the most beneficial bc of how much info we can gain from the exchanges earlier.

bianca vs locket actually provided some funky fresh content. so far slight sl towards bianca considering how she just threw off the argument after locket engaged properly in it. and bianca in general is so inconsistent with how she plays that i wouldn't be surprised if scum bianca would take that risk.

scum is definitely somewhere in bianca, toads, and punchy. though i also feel that ness would add a newbie in the mix too. so far the new guys seem genuine enough and the only outlier is really punchy. these are just quick reads i may put a whole colored list later when im not procrastinating, but im ok with either a punchy info lynch or bianca likely scum lynch.

lol, why is scum "Definitely" in me punchy or bianca....

 

[Biancasbotique]

i\
bianca vs locket actually provided some funky fresh content. so far slight sl towards bianca considering how she just threw off the argument after locket engaged properly in it. and bianca in general is so inconsistent with how she plays that i wouldn't be surprised if scum bianca would take that risk..

I just felt it was not necessary to talk about it further becuase I am not really annoyed with Locket. Sure ..she sussing me all the time is like eh...but in general I chuckle when she does that

 

[Farobi]

are the team players chosen or picked through random chance? im pretty sure i already know the answer but just to make sure

- - - Post Merge - - -

are u actually kidding me

hence a feeling. if we're going by the 3 scum theory there's probably 2 decent players and a new/not very good player. id rather not delve into this because its just all theory but it's still something i'd think worthy to point out.

 

[toadsworthy]

damn you know its bad when bianca calls you out for being "too much"

 

[Biancasbotique]

damn you know its bad when bianca calls you out for being "too much"

well i dont compare people to dogs , i dont go for the jugular you know

 

[illunie]

The "content" statement was a joke....

placeholder votes are the dumbest **** I've ever seen. If you say "I'll come back and change it" then wtf, just come back in the first place and make a real vote. Or you forget to change it and you vote yourself giving absolutely nothing to anything. I'm not saying Waffles is scum or town by it, but like its just stupid because its a piss-poor play as mafia and its a confusing play if she is town.

maybe she didnt know if shed have enough time to change her vote and wanted to make sure she wouldnt be modkilled? im not saying its an exactly stellar argument but it at least makes sense and doesnt warrant getting lynched for it. this just makes you look either pathetic in who u vote for, losing your credibility or straight up scummy

plus, if u dont think its scummy then why vote for her? this game is about killing mafia, not killing people who arent contributing much

 

[toadsworthy]

well i dont compare people to dogs , i dont go for the jugular you know

was mostly going for the comparison that its a ****ty play, but whatever

 

[Farobi]

lol, why is scum "Definitely" in me punchy or bianca....

more so on you vs punchy really. you were the one who brought up punchy with his change in attitude in the game which would obviously remove the possibility between you and punchy as teammates, but there's like this inkling in my mind that that it's such an easy thing for scum to put punchy in the spotlight like that considering how noticeable it seemed. and if it's unlikely not between you, it's probably bianca cause she's still my heaviest sl as of now

 

[illunie]

hence a feeling. if we're going by the 3 scum theory there's probably 2 decent players and a new/not very good player. id rather not delve into this because its just all theory but it's still something i'd think worthy to point out.

i dont like using a rule you 'think' is real rather than hard evidence to prove your point, id rather see real evidence then literally just because hes new

 

[Farobi]

And concerning waffles: she always does that since it was a thing years ago, i guess it's just a habit.

 

[toadsworthy]

maybe she didnt know if shed have enough time to change her vote and wanted to make sure she wouldnt be modkilled? im not saying its an exactly stellar argument but it at least makes sense and doesnt warrant getting lynched for it. this just makes you look either pathetic in who u vote for, losing your credibility or straight up scummy

plus, if u dont think its scummy then why vote for her? this game is about killing mafia, not killing people who arent contributing much

placeholder votes are terrible plays, don't defend them. So you want to let it pass even if waffles is mafia and doing this to just stay alive? There is no way to determine one way or the other when people do this, so people just shouldn't do it. They are confusing to decipher, and people just brush over them without a second thought. So many people of recent are doing it and I haven't been able to say anything about it because I was either scum or hosting lol

 

[Farobi]

i dont like using a rule you 'think' is real rather than hard evidence to prove your point, id rather see real evidence then literally just because hes new

Hard evidence in day 1 is not easy to get bruh, but that rule has been done in the past games so many times that it's still a logical assumption that it may happen in this game too.

Hard evidence in this scenario is a lynch. Who do you think should be considered in the stand?

 

[toadsworthy]

more so on you vs punchy really. you were the one who brought up punchy with his change in attitude in the game which would obviously remove the possibility between you and punchy as teammates, but there's like this inkling in my mind that that it's such an easy thing for scum to put punchy in the spotlight like that considering how noticeable it seemed. and if it's unlikely not between you, it's probably bianca cause she's still my heaviest sl as of now

me and Rune brought it up at the exact same time. And I brought it up, because its absolutely true. Did I run to the polls to place my vote right after, no.... I think its a very noticeable thing and should be considered tbh. Its a lot more tangible of a scum read than half the other namby-pamby bull**** flying around right now too

 

[illunie]

placeholder votes are terrible plays, don't defend them. So you want to let it pass even if waffles is mafia and doing this to just stay alive? There is no way to determine one way or the other when people do this, so people just shouldn't do it. They are confusing to decipher, and people just brush over them without a second thought. So many people of recent are doing it and I haven't been able to say anything about it because I was either scum or hosting lol

im not trying to defend it, and im not trying to let it pass. im just trying to explain what the situation could be like from her point of view. this will probably come up if waffles is brought under scrutiny, but she hasnt really done anything to deserve it up to this point (i mean she hasnt really done anything at all up to rn but thats besides the point) and i think the lynch could be much better used on someone who is under more suspicion at the moment. lynching waffles cos she did something that personally annoys you but doesnt actual lead to u reading her as mafia probably isnt the best play at the moment, especially with so many other targets to hit

 

[Seroja]

I'm pretty good at sniffing out toads and he's smelling pretty town right now.

tbh placeholder is like smtg you do when you're busy and would probably not have time to vote for someone before EOD but also not have anyone scummy enough for you to vote at the time. waffles placing a placeholder on herself without actually giving reason why she was doing it, and sticking around the thread after voting (meaning she's not pressed for time per say) is a bit strange.

also toads vote was probably a reaction test. he can always change his votes later it's not like it's fixed in stone.

 

[toadsworthy]

And concerning waffles: she always does that since it was a thing years ago, i guess it's just a habit.

doesn't excuse it... more reason why they shouldn't be done. Placeholder votes give town nothing, but give mafia plenty of excuses to use later

 

[Biancasbotique]

umm Waffles could vote for herself if she wants. Toads could vote for Waffles if he wants. and I could vote for Locket if i want..

somehow voting early is grounds for being sussed.

 

[toadsworthy]

im not trying to defend it, and im not trying to let it pass. im just trying to explain what the situation could be like from her point of view. this will probably come up if waffles is brought under scrutiny, but she hasnt really done anything to deserve it up to this point (i mean she hasnt really done anything at all up to rn but thats besides the point) and i think the lynch could be much better used on someone who is under more suspicion at the moment. lynching waffles cos she did something that personally annoys you but doesnt actual lead to u reading her as mafia probably isnt the best play at the moment, especially with so many other targets to hit

waffles is no where near getting lynched.... I'm not saying we should lynch waffles, I'm saying placeholder votes are stupid and shouldn't happen. Because they give town nothing and give mafia plenty of excuses. Or say waffles does come under scrutiny, then we use a stupid placeholder vote to sway us one way or another and thats not good reasoning either. NOTHING TO DO WITH PLACEHOLDER VOTES IS PRODUCTIVE FOR TOWN AND THEREFORE JSUT SHOULDNT BE DONE

 

[amazonevan19]

umm Waffles could vote for herself if she wants. Toads could vote for Waffles if he wants. and I could vote for Locket if i want..

somehow voting early is grounds for being sussed.

I don't think you're understanding the argument at all