Mafia The Murder of Woodpines Oregon - Game Thread - Endgame

[toadsworthy]

umm Waffles could vote for herself if she wants. Toads could vote for Waffles if he wants. and I could vote for Locket if i want..

somehow voting early is grounds for being sussed.

voting early is more town-indicative than anything. But not a placeholder vote on oneself... theres nothing town-helpful about it like I have said, same goes for your "always voting ness" thing. You used it to skirt through as scum one game too I remember. Which is another reason why they are stupid

 

[illunie]

waffles is no where near getting lynched.... I'm not saying we should lynch waffles,

then whyd u vote for her if you didnt want her to be lynched? you couldve just posted what you did and left it at that.
the only real issue i have (in terms of argument at least) is the fact that u voted for her, if u didnt vote for her id be fine with everything ur saying rn

- - - Post Merge - - -

the fact that u voted for her led me to believe u wanted her to be lynched. if that isnt what u inted you had no reason to vote for her in the first place

- - - Post Merge - - -

*intended

 

[Biancasbotique]

I don't think you're understanding the argument at all

well my argument is we can vote whoever we want. Why would someone dictate who we are voting for. And placeholder vote? didnt we all do placeholder vote? waffles, toads (i hope its not his final vote) and I?

 

[Seroja]

then whyd u vote for her if you didnt want her to be lynched? you couldve just posted what you did and left it at that.
the only real issue i have (in terms of argument at least) is the fact that u voted for her, if u didnt vote for her id be fine with everything ur saying rn

- - - Post Merge - - -

the fact that u voted for her led me to believe u wanted her to be lynched. if that isnt what u inted you had no reason to vote for her in the first place

- - - Post Merge - - -

*intended

goddd ever heard of a reaction test? but i understand your reasoning.

- - - Post Merge - - -

well my argument is we can vote whoever we want. Why would someone dictate who we are voting for. And placeholder vote? didnt we all do placeholder vote? waffles, toads (i hope its not his final vote) and I?

you can vote for whoever you want granted you give a clear reasoning why you're doing so. make your motivations clear so people can read you properly.

 

[Biancasbotique]

goddd ever heard of a reaction test? but i understand your reasoning.

- - - Post Merge - - -



you can vote for whoever you want granted you give a clear reasoning why you're doing so. make your motivations clear so people can read you properly.

Yes, i did..I am voting for inactives...

 

[illunie]

goddd ever heard of a reaction test? but i understand your reasoning.

the reaction test argument seems like a get out of jail free card for a scum member who tries to call someone out but has it backfire on them. plus it seems to be really convienent if it is a reaction test thats its on someone who does something which toads is apparently really passionately against. it feels like its just toads speaking his mind more than a reaction test

 

[Biancasbotique]

but like you said it's not written in stone. i could change it anytime

 

[illunie]

not saying toads is scum btw dont twist my words

- - - Post Merge - - -

whyyyy

 

[Biancasbotique]

ninja'ed by Rune

 

[toadsworthy]

goddd ever heard of a reaction test? but i understand your reasoning.

yeah part of it too was to see if anyone called me out immediately, but waffles was the first one to really say anything.

and Rune it was to make a statement, that placeholder votes are stupid

The only way to train a dog to stop crapping on the floor is to stick their own nose in it.

 

[Biancasbotique]

and again ninja'ed by him

 

[amazonevan19]

well my argument is we can vote whoever we want. Why would someone dictate who we are voting for. And placeholder vote? didnt we all do placeholder vote? waffles, toads (i hope its not his final vote) and I?

we can vote for whoever we want, but that doesn't mean anyone is free from scrutiny just cuz they're voting early. And in waffles' case, it doesn't make sense for her to vote HERSELF this early.

Now I get toads' argument, that it is confusing and pointless for waffles to do. But I also understand that Waffles does this, and the last thing I'd be doing as mafia is putting a giant spotlight on myself and potentially being seen as WIFOMing hard. Why would scum do that day 1?

Do I think waffles is town? She's null for me rn; I can sense a palable difference between her play this game and last so far...but they've also not really done much and have this self-voting controversy, which isn't alignment-telling for her regardless.

But voting waffles over her self-vote isn't wise rn, imo

 

[illunie]

well my argument is we can vote whoever we want. Why would someone dictate who we are voting for. And placeholder vote? didnt we all do placeholder vote? waffles, toads (i hope its not his final vote) and I?

i mean i guess ur allowed to vote for whoever just like ur technically allowed to say 'im scum haha pls lynch me' but if someone calls u out on it being scummy u cant say that its unfounded because ur allowed to do it

- - - Post Merge - - -

we can vote for whoever we want, but that doesn't mean anyone is free from scrutiny just cuz they're voting early. And in waffles' case, it doesn't make sense for her to vote HERSELF this early.

Now I get toads' argument, that it is confusing and pointless for waffles to do. But I also understand that Waffles does this, and the last thing I'd be doing as mafia is putting a giant spotlight on myself and potentially being seen as WIFOMing hard. Why would scum do that day 1?

Do I think waffles is town? She's null for me rn; I can sense a palable difference between her play this game and last so far...but they've also not really done much and have this self-voting controversy, which isn't alignment-telling for her regardless.

But voting waffles over her self-vote isn't wise rn, imo

ty bb

 

[Seroja]

the reaction test argument seems like a get out of jail free card for a scum member who tries to call someone out but has it backfire on them. plus it seems to be really convienent if it is a reaction test thats its on someone who does something which toads is apparently really passionately against. it feels like its just toads speaking his mind more than a reaction test

you have a point, can't argue with that. but we're nowhere near EOD yet and just one vote won't get waffles lynched. however, this vote generated a lot of content and you're moving further up in my town lean read because of your recent posts.

 

[toadsworthy]

the reaction test argument seems like a get out of jail free card for a scum member who tries to call someone out but has it backfire on them. plus it seems to be really convienent if it is a reaction test thats its on someone who does something which toads is apparently really passionately against. it feels like its just toads speaking his mind more than a reaction test

why the **** would I social justice warrior placeholder votes like this is I was scum also. Isn't the point of a reaction test, to be pretty candid to get --REACTIONS--, so to say talk about it retrospectively like this sounds like you just want to undermine my argument

I know you are not scum reading me, and I wouldn't go to that, but I'm getting more frustrated that you no one is understanding why placeholders are stupid af

 

[illunie]

and Rune it was to make a statement, that placeholder votes are stupid

but you made ur statement through... ur statement (idk how to phrase it), voting for her really gives the wrong message

 

[toadsworthy]

or at least I'm frustrated no one is seeing all the valid points I'm bringing up for why they are stupid af

 

[illunie]

why the **** would I social justice warrior placeholder votes like this is I was scum also. Isn't the point of a reaction test, to be pretty candid to get --REACTIONS--, so to say talk about it retrospectively like this sounds like you just want to undermine my argument

im not saying that the placeholder vote was justified, and im not saying ur position is wrong even if i think waffles could have a potential reason, however weak. im saying u probably shouldnt have voted for her because it gave the wrong message about ur intentions

this argument is pointless anyway, kinda wanna drop it since it isnt getting us anywhere

 

[amazonevan19]

or at least I'm frustrated no one is seeing all the valid points I'm bringing up for why they are stupid af

as I've said a couple times, I clearly understand your point of view, but you're self-contradicting yourself here my friend. If we shouldn't vote waffles over the self-vote, why are YOU doing so? "To make my point hurr" well you already made your point pretty damn clear here in the thread. If you don't want waffles dead, then you shouldn't vote her. Plain and simple. Yeah, we can change, but if waffles can't vote herself because it's stupid, you shouldn't be voting and not really meaning it. Can't have your cake and eat it too.

 

[PunchyTheCat]

I'm going to sleep now bye.