Mafia The Murder of Woodpines Oregon - Game Thread - Endgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
well in retrospect, i do agree with toads about self-vote but like rune..the way he he went about it that i didnt like...you can tell them that they are wrong without belittling them

im ignoring the rudeness bc it doesnt hold any impact on my reads or the way i interpretted the post, im putting more stock into actions rather than meaningless fluff like wording

- - - Post Merge - - -

yeah
but I bet you will think twice about placeholder voting now ;)

but my views on placeholder votes arent finding any scum
 
im ignoring the rudeness bc it doesnt hold any impact on my reads or the way i interpretted the post, im putting more stock into actions rather than meaningless fluff like wording

- - - Post Merge - - -



but my views on placeholder votes arent finding any scum

Civility:
While Mafia is prone to become heated, I ask that you do not personally attack other players. Arguing about the game is acceptable, but there is a fine line between being an rude and doing things strategic to the game. If I find that you are being rude, you will receive one warning. After the warning, its an instantaneous mod-kill and ban from mafia.
 
btw @toads that icon keeps making me think of bianca whenever u type stop

- - - Post Merge - - -

Civility:
While Mafia is prone to become heated, I ask that you do not personally attack other players. Arguing about the game is acceptable, but there is a fine line between being an rude and doing things strategic to the game. If I find that you are being rude, you will receive one warning. After the warning, its an instantaneous mod-kill and ban from mafia.

i mean sure its not great but it doesnt change my view so theres no point addressing it
 
Amazonevan19 - i find evan pretty town right now, there isn't much to go off of but i'm not gonna judge that because i've posted once.
Vampnessa - hi vanessa please change your name i hate calling you vampnessa. anyway her posts read pretty town imo
PunchyDaHufflepuff - posts seem towny to me
Toadsworthy - null because toads doesn't give me enough town/scum vibes
Farobi - posts are town enough for me right now
Amanda1983 - null, can't really get an idea at the moment
Antonio - slight scum because why would he not read other mafia games oh my but also hes noob so i have no idea
Biancasbotque - null, bianca is difficult for me to read (because i can't say hard apparently :( ) mainly because i find her annoying when she posts
Seroja - posts seem legit imo
glow - i can't even tell right now
Runeraider - seems to be more active and townier than in politics mafia
Dedenne2 - seems kinda town but i also don't know
PandaDarling - is kinda inactive but i still won't judge because i'm also inactive
ITookYourWaffles - has weird posts imo

my reads are probably really bad and i'm sorry

Locket's initial reads, note that she was protecting her ego already with "the reads are probably bad"

Then she faces pressure from Punchy and Bianca and continues the routine

it's day one, do you expect reads to be accurate

also i said "also hes a noob so i have no idea"
i'll probably switch it up later

Leaving herself room to switch later while continually emphasizing the badness of the reads either means she didn't put much thought into these reads and is tossing a bunch of scummates into TRs, or she's just trying to appear helpful as either scum or town.

look these are d1 reads they probably aren't even right
i'll switch them up as the game goes on

Why state this? We know d1 reads are preliminary and that they can change. It just looks so weird

Granted, she did say she could claim, so that is something that is holding me back a bit from voting her right now. But the mamsy-pamsiness is not helping her out imho
 
antonio come back from watching snl and explain why you voted for glow lmao

wtf lmao why is this happening
if its a placeholder vote im gonna kashoot myself

- - - Post Merge - - -

Locket's initial reads, note that she was protecting her ego already with "the reads are probably bad"

Then she faces pressure from Punchy and Bianca and continues the routine



Leaving herself room to switch later while continually emphasizing the badness of the reads either means she didn't put much thought into these reads and is tossing a bunch of scummates into TRs, or she's just trying to appear helpful as either scum or town.



Why state this? We know d1 reads are preliminary and that they can change. It just looks so weird

Granted, she did say she could claim, so that is something that is holding me back a bit from voting her right now. But the mamsy-pamsiness is not helping her out imho

the badness lmao
but yeah these are my thoughts exactly
 
What Vanessa said awhile back about my glow accusations. Plus, glow has been quiet. I just have this hunch.
 
Civility:
While Mafia is prone to become heated, I ask that you do not personally attack other players. Arguing about the game is acceptable, but there is a fine line between being an rude and doing things strategic to the game. If I find that you are being rude, you will receive one warning. After the warning, its an instantaneous mod-kill and ban from mafia.

toads wasn't calling ITYW a bad word or something. He was simply using an uncomfortable analogy to emphasize his point. I don't think what he did or has done has crossed any lines in terms of rules. You may not like how he says things, but to slap him with the rules is silly.
 
I agree it was an "in your face" way of saying placeholder/dumb votes are not helpful to town, but like.... what better way to get people to understand you than literally put them in the same thought process as yourself. Which we all worked to get to, * applause *

I feel like you understand it at this point, my blood pressure is lowering

Bianca your play wasn't stupid, in fact to capitalize on something like that in the way you did was clever... so clever that now I'm like "wow I was an idiot for going along with it." But now I say its stupid so that people get deterred from doing it in the future. This is also coming from the guy whose last scum game tactic was to be so ****ing terribly bad, that everyone believed he couldn't be playing that bad as scum.
 
What Vanessa said awhile back about my glow accusations. Plus, glow has been quiet. I just have this hunch.

lots of people have been quiet this game, singling out one person is weird
cant help but noob townread this even more tho
 
toads wasn't calling ITYW a bad word or something. He was simply using an uncomfortable analogy to emphasize his point. I don't think what he did or has done has crossed any lines in terms of rules. You may not like how he says things, but to slap him with the rules is silly.

I know ..i forgot to omit the last two sentences..I was just really going for the first two sentences.
 
I agree it was an "in your face" way of saying placeholder/dumb votes are not helpful to town, but like.... what better way to get people to understand you than literally put them in the same thought process as yourself. Which we all worked to get to, * applause *

I feel like you understand it at this point, my blood pressure is lowering

Bianca your play wasn't stupid, in fact to capitalize on something like that in the way you did was clever... so clever that now I'm like "wow I was an idiot for going along with it." But now I say its stupid so that people get deterred from doing it in the future. This is also coming from the guy whose last scum game tactic was to be so ****ing terribly bad, that everyone believed he couldn't be playing that bad as scum.

pls say frick my parents are watching if i get banned from the computer i wont be able to feed my moshi monster and itll get sad : (
 
Civility:
While Mafia is prone to become heated, I ask that you do not personally attack other players. Arguing about the game is acceptable, but there is a fine line between being an rude and doing things strategic to the game. If I find that you are being rude, you will receive one warning. After the warning, its an instantaneous mod-kill and ban from mafia.

You need to learn to see the forest and not just look at an individual tree
 
Locket's initial reads, note that she was protecting her ego already with "the reads are probably bad"

Then she faces pressure from Punchy and Bianca and continues the routine



Leaving herself room to switch later while continually emphasizing the badness of the reads either means she didn't put much thought into these reads and is tossing a bunch of scummates into TRs, or she's just trying to appear helpful as either scum or town.



Why state this? We know d1 reads are preliminary and that they can change. It just looks so weird

Granted, she did say she could claim, so that is something that is holding me back a bit from voting her right now. But the mamsy-pamsiness is not helping her out imho

idk even as town I make wishy washy statements as well. and imo locket isn't a strong maf player (?) and somehow I don't think her being unsure isn't really that deep. I have never played with them before though so I have no idea how she usually act as town.

going on tone alone she's giving me town vibes.
 
My metaphors have been on point today

I look forward to seeing what glow has to say about all this too

good night, sleep tight, don't let the placeholder votes bite
 
does liking posts count as out of thread communication i swear i saw that one time
even if it does pls keep liking them i need validation
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top