Mafia American Politics Mafia - Game Over - Town Wins!

Well, that's what I am saying. Town is quick to say somebody's confirmed this and that . and where's the proof? I mean Mason? where's the proof? Choose your own Adventure Ness? Where's the proof?

there is no way to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. We're doing a little thing called inference. We have to make some conclusions and get some operating assumptions based on evidence, or else we're never going to get anywhere.

Dolby and Punchy have literally no reason to lie like they have as scum and are easily confirmable if one of them dies.

Ness could not have faked that so convincingly and so specifically.

Therefore it is safe to conclude that Dolby, Punchy, and Ness are very likely confirmed town. At the very least, you should at least see that those three are lower priorities for analysis/doubt than players like Rune and ITYW.
 
because when I first saw it, I thought it was the Louisiana Governor or something who always does the reply to barack obama..

and Ness is from the US..what's the likelihood that he will know who Jagmeet Singh is?

Again, unless he was given a safeclaim.
 
Let me ask you this. Do you even know who Jagmeet Singh is?

Toad tells Bianca to not speculate on flavor name
Bianca immediately speculates on flavor name

giphy.gif
 
there is no way to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. We're doing a little thing called inference. We have to make some conclusions and get some operating assumptions based on evidence, or else we're never going to get anywhere.

Dolby and Punchy have literally no reason to lie like they have as scum and are easily confirmable if one of them dies.

Ness could not have faked that so convincingly and so specifically.

Therefore it is safe to conclude that Dolby, Punchy, and Ness are very likely confirmed town. At the very least, you should at least see that those three are lower priorities for analysis/doubt than players like Rune and ITYW.

Lower priorities are what causing us to mislynch in the first place just saying.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Knowledge-wise no, but I definitely looked him up after the claim

That's what I am trying to say, we all are from the US, you, ness and I and if I am doing a flavor name that's made up, I wouldnt use Jagmeet Singh. Maybe I dont know some other Republican but never in a million years , I would use a lesser known Canadian in the US. We all Know Trudeau...Its my way of semi-clearing Ness so don't strike me for it. y'all.
 
mostly irrelevant but

Jesus christ basically 70 pages and we haven’t even started d1 lynch discussions
 
Toads said:
But I'm the one getting all the flak for it because of how I campaigned, I understand trying to play mediator looks like scum trying to act town, but I literally did the same thing in Kingmaker, which no one wants to admit is true.

I've brought up this like 5 times but everyone ignored it, it really makes me think scum is set on tunneling you to death

Bianca said:
Well, that's what I am saying. Town is quick to say somebody's confirmed this and that . and where's the proof? I mean Mason? where's the proof? Choose your own Adventure Ness? Where's the proof?
CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE NESS LOL I'M DEAD
 
But why are we arguing, I am agreeing that Ness is semi-cleared lol

- - - Post Merge - - -

okay let's talk about the lynch.

We can lynch the inactives. Just saying.
 
Lower priorities are what causing us to mislynch in the first place just saying.

- - - Post Merge - - -



That's what I am trying to say, we all are from the US, you, ness and I and if I am doing a flavor name that's made up, I wouldnt use Jagmeet Singh. Maybe I dont know some other Republican but never in a million years , I would use a lesser known Canadian in the US. We all Know Trudeau...Its my way of semi-clearing Ness so don't strike me for it. y'all.

If you are semi-clearing him, why are you talking about not believing him.... we need to focus on who to lynch like byngo said
 
then...why keep bringing it up...

giphy.gif

It was brought up when the topic of proof came up so it was naturally brought up in the process. Again, don't strike it

- - - Post Merge - - -

So my candidate for lynching are Heyden, Hikari and Locket

- - - Post Merge - - -

Heyden-knowing Heyden, he could have have been doing more (I know I know teapot kettle black) by now. He is very active when he meant to help town..

Hikari- inactive alert

Locket- she literally doesn't read the thread.
 
For lyncherino: anyone on my scumleans is a good candidate imo, my ranking is (top to bottom, most lynchable to least lynchable) rune, ITYW, glow, toads.

Rune: sketchy, confusing, just all around unhelpful to town, nothing of value would be lost by lynching him
ITYW: same as rune with an extra dash of incomprehensible
Glow: Just strange. Honestly can see as a loner TP type
Toads: I am feeling less confident on the toads is scum train, but still have substantial doubts about him. Not sure if his complaints are manufactured or genuine. I feel bad for him but yet I kind of don't based on what he has done

- - - Post Merge - - -

Bianca's lynch targets are...pretty bad, lol

Heyden has barely had time to read/comment on this monster thread. Sure he's a null for me but FAR from a good candidate

Hikari is a weak townlean for me. I like their contributions (however scant they may be) and to put them above Rune is LMAO worthy

Locket not reading the thread COULD mean she's disengaged scum, but I also feel her scummates would be explaining things and screaming at her to not be so damn stupid in thread. To me, she seems townlike for now.
 
ok bianca i want to tl u for something u said but ur making that difficult by focusing on inactives, which is such an easy route to take. if ur town ik ur capable of more
 
ok bianca i want to tl u for something u said but ur making that difficult by focusing on inactives, which is such an easy route to take. if ur town ik ur capable of more

well those are my inactives..but for the scummy ones..why dont we lynch either Dolby or Punchy. As Dolby said, they are not lovers, only Masons, so one dying because the other dies is a poo poo...So if we lynch Dolby, then turned out Mason, it clears Punchy and likewise.
 
I would like to apologize for my inactivity throughout D0. Most of my thoughts were expressed by other people throughout the day (such as Toads being suspsious since he was so opposed to Dolby/Ness being president w/o providing any good reasoning, Ness being a good candidate for president since he claimed blue and provided some very town-leaning post, etc.) so I didn't want to sound redundant/fluffy by posting the same thing as other people.

However, I now realize that this has only made me hard to read (as pointed by many people in their reads), so I will try to be less of a deadweight and focus on expressing my thoughts/reads from now on. (I will be working on writing them up when I get home from school, since the database have caught on fire once again, lol.)
 
well those are my inactives..but for the scummy ones..why dont we lynch either Dolby or Punchy. As Dolby said, they are not lovers, only Masons, so one dying because the other dies is a poo poo...So if we lynch Dolby, then turned out Mason, it clears Punchy and likewise.

latest
 
at least there is no shadow lingering whether both of them are mafia..we do a couple of mislynches in the history of mafia so what is one mislynch to see the truth?
 
and why is it bad if they are mafia?

- - - Post Merge - - -

either we kill two birds with one stone...or we just let them be...

we know Mafia is not gonna kill them now

- - - Post Merge - - -

I meant we kill two birds with one stone...or even if we mislynch, we have a confirmed town
 
Back
Top