I'm still here but I've lost every ounce of motivation I had, I want to replace out but I don't want to screw Tina over with wasting a slot. I'm taking a long break from mafia after this game.
Catching up now.
Catching up now.
Since you're here though, what are your thoughts?
I actually kinda found Ness's post kinda weird because of his alternate attack and defense of Punchy over vastly differing and honestly contradicting points. Moreover, I am also concerned over how he dismisses Fireninja in the whole thing, devoting about a paragraph to saying he's null for voting somebody for no reason.
Dolby said:Frankly, I am actually inclined to agree with Punchy and take Punchy's side on this. Fireninja voted him for no reason. He cited Punchy's vote once, but it was retracted in the same post. Punchy definetely has a right to sus FN over this, and I think that if I was in Punchy's position, I'd do the exact same thing
Dolby said:Pretty much the opposite of what the previous point was. Of note is that Toads was intentionally aggrevating Punchy and even admitted to reaction testing him. I also feel that this was a normal reaction from Punchy
Dolby said:I don't like this given the bolded portion.
Thoughts on what
Do you think he could actually be a jester this time?I said that FireNinja was null because it was similar to the crap he did in Mystic Messenger mafia where he softclaimed jester, he could have been doing the same thing for all I care. FireNinja did not post anything of substance other than "I'm gonna vote punchy", there was nothing to be said. Is that suspicious? Yes, but I felt no need to post anything because everything that could be said was already said by other people. I find him mildly suspicious at this point, but I see him more as some kind of weird 3rd party role. Be honest with yourself; what scum in their right mind would nonchalantly random vote the easiest picking in this game, and then continue to act incredibly aloof in his following posts? Mafia doesn't want to be noticed since they need to fake it until they make it, by randomly voting without ANY reason he is automatically putting himself on the chopping block. He is suspicious, but I don't see what he's doing as mafia.
Do you think he could actually be a jester this time?
I do consider it a possibility.
Oh lol I already did, my most recent thoughts were on the same post as my first one directed to you. Nothing really has changed beyond that. and earlier I've concluded GhostKid and FN are most likely town.On this game of mafia we are currently playing.... who would you vote for, town reads anything
Saying we are going under the radar as your basis for a lynch candidate this early in the game is a heavy claim and I?m interested in seeing what other evidence you have. Dad?s reads? Those went under your radar? More accurately, you were preoccupied, and are just throwing out names of posts you didn't read.
This is one of the more interesting posts in the game currently in my opinion. Rather than bringing up a scummy candidate, Kammm suggested a priority type lynch like iLoveYou did, and argued for, like the majority of this day.
I tried looking back through Kammms posts, but I?m kind of lost because I skimmed most of the debate. Was Kammm one of the players who criticized ILY for her lynch thoughts? For the people who DID criticize ILY for them, what are your thoughts on Kammms suggestion of FN for being distracting rather than scummy?
I'm waiting till after school before officially make statements about people. I want to see what happens.
Most of my problems with this post is that it's utterly contentless. There's no attempt to advance an opinion anywhere, it's just responding to a few posts and not taking specific stances on any of them. (e.g. it's obvious that there are other tactics than chasing after inactives, but Ryu doesn't exactly say what we should do instead of chasing after inactives.)I found out through Discord that thread was locked for sometime. Vanessa said that it was only locked for like maybe two hours. But... I'm glad the game is back on again.
I always thought that the entire purpose would be achieving the wincon of the role one has.
Like:
- Mafia's objective to rid of Town.
- Town's objective to rid of any role that threatens Town.
- With any third party... It just varies.
And things you mentioned were just simply mechanics that one could use to do so.
Would that game be Kingmaker? The one where Ness hosted. I remembered that Tom was a vigilante in that game.
I do understand your dilemma of not wanting players who do "nothing" getting to the end. But... Whether or not it would be considered so just seems subjective to me. The whole going after the inactives is one tactic to use I suppose, but I would rather not be heavily reliant on that in the game. I rather keep in mind of other things as well.
I think you should give it some time. It's not always easy to jump in when playing the game. Just basing this off from the experience I had while playing mafia. It's easy to feel out place when you aren't sure of what to do.
Same problem as above. It's very obviously true that scum could fly under the radar, happens every game. The problem is that there isn't any advance as to who is necessarily flying under the radar and even if there was nobody, who would be most likely to try that. It's completely stripped of any actual stance-taking, just saying "well X and Y are, in general, possible scenarios", but then there's nothing between scenarios X and Y and this game. Even if this wasn't bad enough, the next two quotes prove this further.Okay. That's good to hear at least. I'm still trying to get the hang of things at the moment.
Your idea isn't necessarily bad either. I mean... It's like you said. There could be a possibility that a mafia member could be hiding under the radar. So it is something to keep in mind, but not it's something I want to hold on too much.
1. I don't know why you're asking who the top lynch candidate is and it really sounds like scum trying to get a feel of general consensus. This would be more understandable if you actually advanced an opinion regarding the game, but you haven't, so this looks really bad.Is FireNinja like the number one candidate to go after though?
Oh... Okay then. Appreciate your feedback on that.
With the ideology of the RQS between Dolby and iLoveYou... I'm not sure of what to think of it if I had to be honest. Perhaps it was fabricated or something? It's something I kept in mind while the game was going, but not something I want to hold down so much. The same goes with the whole Ness and Toad's thing that happened too. Mafia is a game of manipulation after all. I think it's just better to be safe than sorry I suppose.
If others have problems with others taking neutral stances then those people are going to have to try harder to convinces other who do take them not to do so. I mean... Impressions and opinions are hard to change sometimes.
I also don't know why you quote me and then say "FN isn't easily swayed" but then you backpedal a ton and go "that's the only reason" and "it's a potential possibility, that's all"--it feels artificial (especially since both of the forces pulling toward town and scum are objectively weak, and then also you just saying "that's the only reason" and "it's a potential possibility" confuses me especially because you don't express what specifically is holding you back)Mhm... I see. I'm assuming this has to do with FireNinja's vote on Punchy.
The above was his supposed reasoning on why they voted on Punchy for a lynch. Only thing I like about is that it seems like FireNinja isn't easily swayed by other people based on how they responded about their vote on Punchy. That's the only reason I would want to have them around is because of that.
It's a potential possibility is all I have to say.
You mentioned me, kammm and ILY. What about the others, update on punchy or ness?
my response to toad's question wasn't all that serious..he didn't give me time to assess other players and really think of a good choice lol so I just said who came to mind first. We still have until tomorrow to decide who to lynch, so I don't really think FN is a good option unless he begins showing real scummy signs.
Okay.Honestly that's the most scummy thing anyone's done. Voting you.
Trouble in Alola, I think.Fireninja what were you're most recent games? Carnival? People should really go read it
"All accusations"?FN's awaited response to accusations was honestly a let down and his so called "defenses" were half-a**ed. He brushed off all accusations by saying things like "this is false" or "not true" which don't seem like valid defenses imo. Does anybody else find this odd? I'm unsure if these are an indication of scum tho, because like I said earlier it seems to be WAY too obvious ;/
Thinks that Ness v Toads is town v town. I personally think that this is very possible, but really I want more elaborationThe Ness v Toads thing that happened feels like Town v Town to me. Though, Ness breaking like that is pretty strange.
FN is pretty weird in his posts. He refuses to elaborate a lot. He doesn't have a lot of good contributions so far.
I'll add more later but I've had a long couple of days so I'm gonna rest a bit.
I don't like the general vibe I'm getting from Locket's post. This seems like a easy post to try to gain towncred. Definetely to early to tell though, given how little has been said. However, Locket's comments really seem to be somewhat different for her in comparison to APM and Murder of whatever. I personally feel then that she was more focused on scumhuntingLet's move on for now, but keep them both in mind.
Why do I get the feeling that Dolby might be trying to get on my good side?
Trundle/Ghost are not a team. Trundle does not go out of his way to dismiss a purported townslip from his teammateIt's also been less than an hour since the game started. It's possible that 1) he isn't listening 2) he hasn't read mafia chat and many other things. Not that I think he's mafia, but it's not smart to rule it out so fast.
I assumed you were going to say that, but here is my "D1 first few hours" reads:
Tom - Mafia
toads - Posting seems weird but it always does and I got to observe his scum style quite closely in my game. I'm thinking town (even though his post ("*obligatory post about stupidly early read*") is the reason I mentioned the red flags.
Punchy - Possible mafia
Dolby - Town
Ghostkid - Probably town
I'm getting a town read from iLoveYou but I haven't played with her in literally years and she also tricked me super hardcore in my first mafia game ever, I wouldn't call anything too confident out on her so hopefully votes/actions can reveal something.
FireNinja is probably town, just being some kind of edgelord for the sake of it.
The whole "why u voting this why u voting that" is super off-topic and is already causing town to lose focus. If you're town and taking part in this conversation just drop it because it's derailing the little good conversation we have so far.
I know that I've said that I like Trundle's early confidence. This I don't like though. Kammm's probably done more than all of the extremely new players, but really hasn't done anything to warrent a strong TR imo. And I've seen a lot of people pushing that idea.Kammm is easily town in my eyes
ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhI just went through his posts and he hasn't really posted anything substantial, and his punchy vote seems really random? FN seems v fishy but I also feel like that's too obvious as mafia, would he really vote somebody right away without explanation if he was trying to lay low?
- - - Post Merge - - -
The whole "we aren't a team" was random to me as well, I don't see why FN would feel the need to say that as nobody had even considered the fact that they were a team. I agree with punchy, FN is either playing bad town or bad scum lol. Not quite sure who a jester is tho?
Noting this for future referenceWhat triggered a "gut feeling" that Tom is mafia? I've seen a few other people say he's possible scum as well, but I think we need more posts from him before we can start saying he's sus.
This is kinda weirdFN's awaited response to accusations was honestly a let down and his so called "defenses" were half-a**ed. He brushed off all accusations by saying things like "this is false" or "not true" which don't seem like valid defenses imo. Does anybody else find this odd? I'm unsure if these are an indication of scum tho, because like I said earlier it seems to be WAY too obvious ;/
Don't really like this post at all. It feels like he's attempting to look like he's participating in the game when in reality, it's just a diversion towards those 4 people, or just plain filler. I think Rune did something similar as scum in American Politics.
2nd time he's postponed any form of opinion so far in the game. Looking at his first game, he was very actively involved in as town just asking random questions and saying whatever was on his mind. Right now he feels a bit restrictive of what he's saying, holding back from blurting out things at every moment which seemed apparent in his first game.I'm waiting till after school before officially make statements about people. I want to see what happens.
'Punchy is acting dumb on purpose to make us think he's a bad mafia'. I've read this quote like 10 times and it's very awkwardly phrased to say the least, don't know what the heck she's saying. Looking at her other posts she hasn't really said much either, and is sort of going with the flow reminding me of my first game where I was scum as well.Punchy is acting rly dumb but maybe hes doing that on purpose to make us think hes a bad mafia idk