blossum
ღ🍨🌸∵あま&#
Lol
I quoted it because I've already read it before and it well explains my stance. Obviously I don't browse r/feminazis or anti feminism; I already consume enough salt from league lel. It doesn't explain the definition of egalitarianism? Just a stance? I understand egalitarianism is equality FOR ALL, but so is feminism, which is literally what those users said. True feminism is about equal rights for everyone...? I understand and am with you when people neglect the other genders and only focus on females, or even try to comply with double standards. However like those users said, I believe feminists are overall trying to take more action than egalitarians. Some egalitarians are doing God's work and progressing with real acts, but you often hear their beliefs and not their actions. Before going fruitful on me this is just expository, and I will explicitly repeat there are always two sides. Similarly, there are plenty of feminists who do not take action either.
Look, my aim wasn't to insult egalitarianism because it literally wants equal rights which is what I want. My issue was for specifically for that SOME people do prefer it because they don't want to be labelled a feminist because of it's radical undertones. I don't think you can disagree with that? I know there are a lot of people like you who can be honest with truly wanting equality through being an egalitarian, but there are literally users who posted in this thread who won't call themselves feminists because it's too extreme and would rather call themselves egalitarians. So the whole preference thing.. the half-hearted egalitarians out there.. is what I'm accusing. Do you just not believe people can sway to egalitarianism in preference to feminism? If that piece can stay on wikipedia then there's enough people who believe they can do that...