i think that punchy and heyden didn't want you to go on and give hints about your partner because that would narrow the bluepool even more. additionally, if shawo were to claim to be your partner, you could easily just deny the claim and everybody would believe you since you claimed mason first. if you thought you were going to die on n1, you should've said it a few minutes before the phase ended.
but i believe that it is best that we don't hold onto this mistake, and instead focus on the situation now.
it's also unreliable meta. do you think that people would play the same as they played two years ago?
i agree that meta is a form of sorting out a difficult read, but it shouldn't be something almost always referred to.
it also makes the list smaller on who isn't blue.
i'm not comfortable with lynching tae.
i believe that tae's reaction could be genuine. as town, you could get really frustrated that people are sussing you and not going onto other people who really are mafia. i'm not saying that tae is 100% mafia or town, but i'm saying that it wouldn't be abnormal to have that reaction as a town player.
i agree with this post a lot.
heyden's really been confusing me, he barely even explained his vote and it was extremely early. i don't see why one would want to bandwagon that early in the phase but heyden definitely needed to explain it earlier. if it was a reaction test, heyden should've taken the vote away by now?
punchy, the fact that you say this (even though i put you in null, half townlean!):
then this:
shows that you didn't read the thread (or at least my posts) properly.
i pulled quotes on daniel who yes, i did have a townlean, but also evan, who i put as a null. i didn't use quotes to only support who i wanted to townlean.
if you want quotes on oath (one of my slight susses) then here you go:
all of these above quotes are irrelevant and unneeded to the current discussion. you can see in some posts that he tries starting interactions but they're either 1) very filler (like the "why is it sad" one) or 2) insignificant and giving no information, even if the question was answered ("i don't think anyone thought that").
for daniel, i explained it in the post itself.
for emolga, i said it before night one too.
in response to your iso, geoni:
you see, at this time i didn't understand that what shawo said was a joke. that's why i asked you about it. and i continued on with it as well.
he attacked trundle for overthinking then went on to overthink himself, doubting his skills of reading mog. i, however, have a different view on punchy now.
it wasn't overcritical, i requested punchy to make reads on people that he wasn't familiar with. also keep in mind that i barely knew that punchy's normal playstyle was like this (until i was told of it), i assumed he was a fairly experienced player and that's why i held onto his sus, because his play looked wrong to me.
what i meant to shawo was that his logic wasn't bad but i didn't want to vote no lynch. i explained this all earlier with the 'wasting time on a whole phase' part of my post.
i'm not implying the tone "i was right not to be on the wagon", i was moreover asking "how are we going to collect information from this lynch in midst of all the cfds?"
to me, there really is nothing else to justify the panda wagon but her popping in and people getting shocked and wanting to vote her.
i didn't call the jacob wagon bad at all. i agreed with where it came from, but i went onto somebody who i sussed more.
i read the mafia encyclopedia on these forums, and i've also been using the word cfd because i'd learnt it from what you all were saying. specifically for the word bluesnipe, evan mentioned it like 5 posts earlier than me and i assumed its meaning (it's fairly obvious).
if i were to be scum and snipe those two, why would i even point out that they were both on my reads list?
Post automatically merged:
i explained this to you before, with my werewolf experience. i'll try look for the quote.
Post automatically merged:
oh it was actually in response to jacob.
Post automatically merged:
i did not intend to contribute anything at all. in fact, there's nothing at all to contribute with that question. all that question asks is for three random people and i picked them out of rng, as i had no gut feelings.
Post automatically merged:
i initally planned to go from top to bottom, but then i decided to do whoever came to mind because time was running out until the phase ended. i will continue writing the latter half but i've been too busy replying to all this.
i quoted my previous read on emolga in my response to dad's iso.
Post automatically merged:
initally*
at this point i'm just spamming, sorry.
Last edited:
