"For example the small canvas and the level of detail that can be incorporated." What does this... mean? Art being on a smaller and/or pixelated canvas doesn't mean it's any less detailed if that's what you're implying? I hope I'm wrong there 'cause otherwise you've disrespected a
huge portion of the art community including every single pixel/sprite artist. That little bar with the hearts and dots alone is an impressive detail, and was probably frustrating to make perfect. Not to mention that cursive L not being misaligned or otherwise throwing off the composition at all!
Since others are showing past submissions, I also want to showcase mine for the Christmas card event in 2024 that was accepted:
That little card was two dimes tall and took me maybe 10 minutes. What makes a 3ds screen any less acceptable? Because it's certainly not the canvas size. Plenty of other users do quicker, larger, less detailed doodles just for participation and they're accepted pretty hastily.
When I was pursuing my art degree something that was nailed into my and my peers' heads when we would have critiques is that unless you know someone well enough, it is
impossible to judge the amount of effort behind a piece, because everyone's pace and skill level is different. The "level of detail" has nothing to do with effort, which is the point you stressed in your two prior posts. I hope this judgement is just ill-informed because the jump in reasoning between the initial rejection and this post really gives off the impression of being biased against an artist for doing something different, which in art spaces is widely celebrated not punished.