Somewhat ISO on Waffles:
Im kinda fearing Dolby tbh like what if this time hes a scum I usually see him as town yanno and it would be really a risk if we rush off voting him just saying
We can't just rash vote Dolby sorry dude but its really risky for you to vote man aside from you as experienced player i rather vote someone confident of alignment like for example Vanessa ya get what i mean right?
Ik i'm beating a dead horse by bringing these posts again, but I still find it hard to get over just how suspicious they are. I want to say I've come to the conclusion at this point that the reason scum wanted me as president (as shown by the landslide win) is three reasons:
1. They thought I would be less of a threat than Dolby
(which they're right I guess)
2. They figured that by electing a blue role they could blend in with the crowd, as I had a bit of a band wagon effect by claiming blue
3. They must have thought that it wouldn't be that hard to dispose of me with the president only having 1 bodyguard for protection (which isn't the case now since I have 3 vests).
So, I think that Waffles might have been trying to discredit a Dolby campaign purely out of fear for the future. It made absolutely no sense to have been saying that "ohh dolby has me concerned" when it was literally only 2 pages into the game. That, and Waffles brought up 2 players who are generally considered "mid tier" (me and Vanessa) so I can see Waffles trying to keep experienced players away from president.
This was waffles calling out
PunchyDaHufflepuff for him being suspicious of
Runeraider. I find this post to probably be Waffle's most questionable one, as Punchy barely even said a word about Runeraider with this post:
Runeraider post already. Please.
Seems almost like Waffles is lowkey deflecting suspicion.
Townlean: PunchyDaHufflepuff, N e s s, Dolby,
Slight Townlean: Runeraider, glow
Slight Scumlean: Toadsworthy, Dad (Gutfeeling), Locket (Gutfeeling), Jacob
I find it very interesting how Waffle's only reasoning for the Toadsworthy suspicion is a one liner saying:
I personally didn't like how Toad's act towards Ness and Dolby what is ur frigging objective huh?
And that is enough to warrant a scumlean. Something else I find interesting?
The fact that Locket is a part of the scumleans based on a "gut feeling". Oh, and it's pretty coincidental that
Runeraider is a part of the slight town leans as well. What reasoning is there for any of these scum/slight town leans exactly? None. This entire reads post that Waffles created is disguised to look like she's doing something when in reality it's just refuting points everyone else has already said.
Lemme bet my kidney that at least 1 or 2 in my scumlean list are scum
This post makes me want to say that if Waffles is scum then she pulled the classic "Town/Scum/Town" reads sandwich so that she could later say "OOOH I was right about them!!!". Kinda want to say this might be true given I'm kinda suspicious of Jacob right now.
Feel free to go back and reread this post if you want proof, but I want to say that it feels as if this post has no substance to it? Its a bunch of quotes tied together with a little blurb at what Waffles thinks it's saying, but theres no conclusion to it; no original thoughts that prove that there is something suspicious about Toadsworthy. At most Waffles says "yah thats odd", but once again its something that looks as if Waffles is trying to be useful when she isn't.
And when did I attack Rune raider???
Getting anxious about Runeraider...hmmmmmmmmm
****ing hell so much thing to catch up reveal the messages now guys and now im having doubts with toads and vanessas claim but if i were to pick who to lynch its Toads man hes most suspicious of all anyway
- - - Post Merge - - -
Wtf 3 millers what is **** is going on in here
And this is yet another thing I find peculiar. Waffles comes in here and basically says
"oh man i got tons of stuff to catch up on i'll go ahead and vote Toad cuz he vry sus xD". Once again, there literally next to no reasoning stated as to why she voted him other than the claim.
You know what you do have a point screw this
I find it kinda interesting how Waffles says to Toadsworthy that she thinks he has a point, yet she continues to keep her vote on him. She says he has a point with this post:
No the way glow was defending my argument against Vanessa it came off strange.... like why wouldn't you think I would be suspicious of anyone who claims the same thing minutes after me. I needed time to digest. Did glow say vanessa was scum earlier? Like I said I runs her out because of her extreme tunneling
Waffles if he had a point, then why would you keep your vote on him lol.
Ugh finally we lynch scum we can go for either locket or toads but im leaning towards toads still and ofc i too not impressed with my current playstyle I egen trying to catcg up man
///(ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧ excuse me as i subtly try to act happy about lynching rune when i kept my vote on the guy who is probably town at this point
✧゚・: *ヽ(◕ヮ◕ヽ)///
- - - Post Merge - - -
So yeah, in conclusion I want to lynch Waffles next.