My partner let me sleep all day and I am sleep-drunk af rn. In no condition try and re-write those in-depth (with quotes etc) reads I still owe on
Vanessa,
Trundle,
Kammm,
glow just yet.
In the meantime :
Vanessa -
Ness pointed out it's hard to see
Vanessa being so vocal as
scum!Vanessa (post # 2893) - this strikes me as just more WIFOM. I would expect
scum!Vanessa to try hard to mimic her
Town!Vanessa play and be rather good at it frankly, given how perceptive she is. I know her irl stuff is putting heavy restrictions on how much time she can spend here, hence why she was a replacement (as she's already pointed out), but I think
scum!Vanessa would know that being vocal would be more beneficial to her than trying to coast. Of course, Town!Vanessa would also be motivated to be vocal simply because that's how she is.. and this is why WIFOM ****ing sucks.
Trundle remains my top SR and will most likely get my vote barring new developments. His response to people sussing him was underwhelming and not really alignment-indicative - I get the lack of motivation to play this mess of a game + being busy af irl I really do, but that is such a ****ing easy way out and I just cannot see Town motivation behind his play this entire game, for reasons covered in depth elsewhere by
Ness,
Heyden, and
glow in particular.
Kammm is still Town and
Evan is even scummier after his ISO of
Kammm which managed to almost completely disregard NewTown perspective, motivation, and knowledge at every turn.. sure, her content would be suspicious from a player that knows how to play Mafia but she doesn't *coz this is literally her first ****ing game * and it's odd af how he kept overlooking the bleeding obvious
NewTown!Kammm perspective. That whole ISO is just sus af imo.
glow - I'm reading
glow more and more as Town. The way she made her Blue claim, and rationale behind it make a great deal more sense to me for her play this whole game to be
Town!glow than it does for a
scum!glow. I'm aware it could be a gambit but it's a completely SubOptimal one if so and, ya, WIFOM of course but ... her claim + content in the past chronological day or so reflect a much more Town perspective + motivation (including making retrospective sense of previously sus content) than I can reconcile with a
scum!glow choosing to play.
- - - Post Merge - - -
--- snip ---
Amanda stop liking people's content-based posts and actually state why you agree with their reads/critiques/etc in your posts please.
Will do from now on, sorry.
- - - Post Merge - - -
EBWOP : I have done so at points in this game, not something I'm avoiding or anything. It's mostly just when I'm coming back to a bunch of content and am trying to catch up quickly that I do it as I've found that trying to draft responses to blocks of content like that just ends up with much of what I write being discarded as superfluous or irrelevant by the time I'm ready to post.
Eh, anyway, your point is noted and I'll try to act accordingly in the future.